From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1273B6DE1479 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:56:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.144 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.144 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.168, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, URIBL_SBL=0.644, URIBL_SBL_A=0.1] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QkI9UY90aOqt for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:56:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (mail-wi0-f176.google.com [209.85.212.176]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A60026DE143A for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:56:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so253472086wic.0 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:56:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=mjHXvEYGY1ZJrd3UAFQ+gAa6xvbqx7Keg9XZwwfZ7k8=; b=StEfazSstN8fSsUCbwfu2FzH2g2EK4S9CQ5gAgikiDEKFIc+imk7sV/PVwqtA4+pZc mDGHA5TvABrn8TlwJWEy4u0RfGUTwQogNZKHM2ykToUaHHGtVI32b2YDnnKDxuqBDnv1 WCx92kLo6ZDLybNqUpgwzUb4ca1PNMkfFPvXx9al2aoLRekM5o0PjEvNRdiLgxNhY5bZ bXU9ZrRicz4ADEs6Oih1dNpyWr7y33rFx5nEVAiDR+eqA6PDvNixXw3mxpBuesiOWgD0 iTFlqFdt+s1iTvL9gKg5T7MgRN3n5419nZyFOERTc5uiVsENqbtTlLgBX7jYWIE8qBvA /l6w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmqIbfobOsIT837lbd5u5M4Rgjjy2Sa4HB6gLQff2VrUQ4ydF3a8nhxxysfmFjx1JXS/MGc X-Received: by 10.180.8.200 with SMTP id t8mr5756474wia.34.1443034589978; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:56:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (mobile-access-bcee4f-131.dhcp.inet.fi. [188.238.79.131]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ly4sm8643103wjb.4.2015.09.23.11.56.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 23 Sep 2015 11:56:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Jani Nikula To: David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IFtQQVRDSCAzwr0vOV0gdGVzdDogbm90bXVjaCBhZGRyZXNz?= =?UTF-8?B?IC0tZGVkdXBsaWNhdGU9bm8gdGVzdHM=?= In-Reply-To: <87a8shtg4w.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> References: <1441391716-17282-1-git-send-email-jani@nikula.org> <87a8shtg4w.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+66~gb33abd9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 21:56:11 +0300 Message-ID: <87mvwddkxg.fsf@nikula.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 18:56:34 -0000 On Sun, 20 Sep 2015, David Bremner wrote: > Jani Nikula writes: > >> Test not using address deduplication. Incorporate some trivial output >> sorting tests here, as they seem to lack tests. >> --- >> test/T095-address.sh | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/test/T095-address.sh b/test/T095-address.sh >> index 8eecb2a6a7ba..f8d902cb3a5e 100755 >> --- a/test/T095-address.sh >> +++ b/test/T095-address.sh >> @@ -145,4 +145,74 @@ cat <EXPECTED >> EOF >> test_expect_equal_file OUTPUT EXPECTED >> >> +test_begin_subtest "--deduplicate=no --sort=oldest-first --output=sender" >> +notmuch address --deduplicate=no --sort=oldest-first --output=sender '*' >OUTPUT >> +cat <EXPECTED >> +Mikhail Gusarov >> +Mikhail Gusarov >> +Carl Worth > >> + >> +test_begin_subtest "--deduplicate=no --sort=newest-first --output=sender --output=recipients" >> +notmuch address --deduplicate=no --sort=newest-first --output=sender --output=recipients path:foo/new >OUTPUT >> +cat <EXPECTED >> +Mikhail Gusarov >> +notmuch@notmuchmail.org >> +Mikhail Gusarov > > Two comments: > > 1) It's suprising that Mikail is first in both the newest-first and > oldest-first list. Is it easy to explain why? > > 2) the use of path: term is not mentioned in the description. Should it > be mentioned somehow? I wanted to have a smaller set of results in the second test, and path: was an easy filter so I could look at the files there to construct the expected results. That also explains the first part; it just so happened that the folder I arbitrarily picked happened to have Mikail there. BR, Jani. > > d