From: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>
To: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>,
David Bremner <david@tethera.net>,
notmuch@notmuchmail.org, notmuch@freelists.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v2] build: add target to run cppcheck
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 21:36:32 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mv6ikyq7.fsf@nikula.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170829113526.10435-1-david@tethera.net>
On Tue, 29 Aug 2017, David Bremner <david@tethera.net> wrote:
> The advantage of having a target as opposed to running cppcheck by
> hand
>
> - reuse list of source files
> - output errors in a format parsable, e.g. by emacs
> - returns exit code 1 on any error, for possibly use in other
> targets.
>
> For the moment, leave this as an optional target. If desired, it can
> be added to e.g. the release targets in the same way as the test
> target.
>
> Using two levels of directory for the stamps is arguably
> overengineering, but it doesn't really cost anything, and leaves open
> the possibility of putting other kinds of stamp files there.
>
> This only checks "new" source files (w.r.t. their last check). A future target
> (cppcheck-all ?) could blow away the stamp files first.
>
> ---
>
> Two notable changes from the first version: 1) support parallel build,
> inspired by id:87pobhl8wc.fsf@nikula.org; 2) use the predefined 'gcc'
> template. It's still an optional target, as that felt most comfortable
> as a workflow to me.
This is nice. LGTM. I might have left out --error-exitcode=1 myself but
no strong feelings.
I thought the quiet build lines like
CPPCHECK .stamps/cppcheck/util/error_util.c
were a bit ugly, so I came up with [1]. With that plus this change:
- $(call quiet,CPPCHECK) --template=gcc --error-exitcode=1 --quiet $<
+ $(call quiet,CPPCHECK,$<) --template=gcc --error-exitcode=1 --quiet $<
you get
CPPCHECK util/error_util.c
BR,
Jani.
[1] id:20170829182709.26841-2-jani@nikula.org
>
> Makefile.local | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> configure | 11 +++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Makefile.local b/Makefile.local
> index af12ca7f..c6ad0047 100644
> --- a/Makefile.local
> +++ b/Makefile.local
> @@ -199,6 +199,14 @@ quiet ?= $($(shell echo $1 | sed -e s'/ .*//'))
> @mkdir -p $(patsubst %/.,%,.deps/$(@D))
> $(call quiet,CC $(CPPFLAGS) $(CFLAGS)) -c $(FINAL_CFLAGS) $< -o $@ -MD -MP -MF .deps/$*.d
>
> +CPPCHECK=cppcheck
> +.stamps/cppcheck/%: %
> + @mkdir -p $(@D)
> + $(call quiet,CPPCHECK) --template=gcc --error-exitcode=1 --quiet $<
> + @touch $@
> +
> +CLEAN := $(CLEAN) .stamps
> +
> .PHONY : clean
> clean:
> rm -rf $(CLEAN); rm -rf .deps
> @@ -283,6 +291,16 @@ CLEAN := $(CLEAN) version.stamp notmuch-*.tar.gz.tmp
>
> DISTCLEAN := $(DISTCLEAN) .first-build-message Makefile.config sh.config
>
> +CPPCHECK_STAMPS := $(SRCS:%=.stamps/cppcheck/%)
> +.PHONY: cppcheck
> +ifeq ($(HAVE_CPPCHECK),1)
> +cppcheck: ${CPPCHECK_STAMPS}
> +else
> +cppcheck:
> + @echo "No cppcheck found during configure; skipping static checking"
> +endif
> +
> +
> DEPS := $(SRCS:%.c=.deps/%.d)
> DEPS := $(DEPS:%.cc=.deps/%.d)
> -include $(DEPS)
> diff --git a/configure b/configure
> index c5e2ffed..364854f3 100755
> --- a/configure
> +++ b/configure
> @@ -646,6 +646,14 @@ if [ $WITH_DESKTOP = "1" ]; then
> fi
> fi
>
> +printf "Checking for cppcheck... "
> +if command -v cppcheck > /dev/null; then
> + have_cppcheck=1
> + printf "Yes.\n"
> +else
> + printf "No.\n"
> +fi
> +
> libdir_in_ldconfig=0
>
> printf "Checking which platform we are on... "
> @@ -1065,6 +1073,9 @@ zsh_completion_dir = ${ZSHCOMLETIONDIR:=\$(prefix)/share/zsh/functions/Completio
> # build its own version)
> HAVE_CANONICALIZE_FILE_NAME = ${have_canonicalize_file_name}
>
> +# Whether the cppcheck static checker is available
> +HAVE_CPPCHECK = ${have_cppcheck}
> +
> # Whether the getline function is available (if not, then notmuch will
> # build its own version)
> HAVE_GETLINE = ${have_getline}
> --
> 2.14.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-29 18:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-26 14:41 make notmuch cppcheck clean David Bremner
2017-08-26 14:41 ` [PATCH 1/5] build: add target to run cppcheck David Bremner
2017-08-27 8:20 ` Jani Nikula
2017-08-29 11:35 ` [Patch v2] " David Bremner
2017-08-29 18:36 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2017-08-29 18:47 ` Jani Nikula
2017-08-30 23:28 ` David Bremner
2017-08-26 14:41 ` [PATCH 2/5] cppcheck: close files during shutdown David Bremner
2017-08-26 14:41 ` [PATCH 3/5] cppcheck: call va_end in _internal_error David Bremner
2017-08-26 14:41 ` [PATCH 4/5] test/smtp-dummy: uncrustify David Bremner
2017-08-26 14:41 ` [PATCH 5/5] test/smtp-dummy: convert to 'goto DONE' style David Bremner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://notmuchmail.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mv6ikyq7.fsf@nikula.org \
--to=jani@nikula.org \
--cc=david@tethera.net \
--cc=notmuch@freelists.org \
--cc=notmuch@notmuchmail.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).