From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97FED431FBC for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:08:29 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NXvSUpL2IyDS for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:08:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF67431FAE for ; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:08:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp04.online.nl (smtp04.online.nl [194.134.41.34]) by mx.perfora.net (node=mxus2) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0Lp4DU-1NxeyO1eOi-00eunw for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:08:28 -0500 Received: from smtp04.online.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp04.online.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 238B3E387; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:08:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from gopher (s55919504.adsl.wanadoo.nl [85.145.149.4]) by smtp04.online.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:08:26 +0100 (CET) Received: by gopher (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3F7C62321C0; Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:08:18 +0100 (CET) From: Marten Veldthuis To: Carl Worth , Mark Anderson , notmuch In-Reply-To: <87ws0ug23f.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> References: <1260400470-sup-5775@testarossa> <87ws0ug23f.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:08:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87ljha3avx.fsf@home.veldthuis.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Online-Scanned: by Cloudmark authority (on smtp04.online.nl) Subject: Re: Threading X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:08:29 -0000 On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:39:48 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > I think the right answer here is to fix the input that notmuch is > getting. Just ensure that each message has a proper In-Reply-To header > and all should be fine. On a related note, what about communicating with people who press reply on an existing message, change the subject and start a new mail thread. Most mail clients will still insert the In-Reply-To header, which in this case is just wrong. Ofcourse, it's their fault, but one can't educate the entire world. Is there anything like mutt has, to break a thread at the current message? -- - Marten