From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44607431FBF for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 07:39:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fjFNUZGjFCQh for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 07:39:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C091C431FBD for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 07:39:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WRjYX-0002ME-7O; Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:39:21 -0300 Received: (nullmailer pid 16081 invoked by uid 1000); Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:39:17 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Jani Nikula , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] notmuch-new: block database upgrades in default configuration. In-Reply-To: <87r45trnio.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <87bnx4jyyp.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <1395541573-2417-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> <1395541573-2417-3-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> <87ppldrocd.fsf@nikula.org> <87r45trnio.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.17+133~g5348d19 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 11:39:17 -0300 Message-ID: <87lhw1rnca.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 14:39:28 -0000 David Bremner writes: > Jani Nikula writes: > >> We really have very few configuration options, and so far none of them >> are such that we could make the decision for the user. I think in this >> case pushing the responsibility to the user would be just *us* being >> paranoid. What does that tell our users? > > I don't care either way, I just want to do a release. It's easier to err > on the side of being paranoid. So please collectively sort out what you > want, and if you want something different other than the status quo or > this, please send patches ASAP. Umm, of course by "this", I mean some polished version of the series. d