From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A16431FB6 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 09:22:05 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UBFaSN1+IirL for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 09:21:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (yantan.tethera.net [199.188.72.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59AB4431FAE for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 09:21:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by yantan.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XqmTU-0001Z0-3X; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 13:21:56 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 22300 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:21:50 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Olivier Berger Subject: Re: tag:deleted messages immediately deleted ? In-Reply-To: <871tp0ek8b.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr> References: <877fyseuq8.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr> <87d28ku7rt.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <871tp0ek8b.fsf@inf-11879.int-evry.fr> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.19+2~g32855b9 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 18:21:50 +0100 Message-ID: <87lhn8fmq9.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 17:22:05 -0000 Olivier Berger writes: > > I'm using a local dovecot as a mail storage backend, which is in turn > indexed my botmuch... any particular thing related to dovecot flags > handling maybe (i.e. deleted tag being passed to dovecot) ? > Nope, we rejected synching the T flag to maildirs for exactly this reason. I wonder if you have multiple excluded tags on these messages somehow. If you run "notmuch search --exclude=false tag:deleted" do you get some output? If so, what tags do these messages have? d