From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C336DE13DC for ; Sun, 14 Jun 2015 23:35:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.187 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.187 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.187] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oseiSwiwuRyT for ; Sun, 14 Jun 2015 23:35:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com (gitolite.debian.net [87.98.215.224]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 800346DE0FB1 for ; Sun, 14 Jun 2015 23:35:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by mx.xen14.node3324.gplhost.com with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Z4NzM-0000nx-8Z; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 06:35:20 +0000 Received: (nullmailer pid 9113 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 15 Jun 2015 06:35:01 -0000 From: David Bremner To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [patch v3 1/4] build: integrate building ruby bindings into notmuch build process In-Reply-To: <87zj4415bu.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> References: <1425679073-30439-5-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> <1433142542-2307-1-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> <1433142542-2307-2-git-send-email-david@tethera.net> <87zj4415bu.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.1+21~g4e79903 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 08:35:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87lhfl4gyy.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 06:35:58 -0000 David Bremner writes: > David Bremner writes: > >> Because ruby generates a Makefile, we have to use recursive make. >> Because mkmf.rb hardcodes the name Makefile, put our Makefile{.local} >> in the parent directory. > > Pushed the first patch in the series. Let's see if anything breaks. > It turned out the answer was "Mac", so I pushed the next two patches as well. I threw in the actual tests, since that was the point of this effort. d