From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD5B6DE192B for ; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:17:50 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.307 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.244, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.55, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i9Xs4xE0IU7N for ; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:17:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E0EC6DE1903 for ; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 10:17:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aUeki-00057g-TI; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 13:17:04 -0500 Received: (nullmailer pid 22381 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:17:44 -0000 From: David Bremner To: "W. Trevor King" Cc: David Edmondson , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: nmbug in the Debian packages? In-Reply-To: <20160208193804.GE4265@odin.tremily.us> References: <87twlj8mix.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <20160208193804.GE4265@odin.tremily.us> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+26~g9404723 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:17:44 -0400 Message-ID: <87lh6o79vb.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:17:50 -0000 "W. Trevor King" writes: > On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 07:33:10AM -0400, David Bremner wrote: >> We can include it in /usr/bin along and install a proper man page=E2=80= =A6 > > I'm happy to write up a man page. Do you want it in a separate > directory from nmbug-status / notmuch-report [1]? Do you want to > rename nmbug to something notmuch-* namespaced? > I guess if we're going to treat it as a first class citizen, then yeah, it should be in the notmuch- namespace. It would also need some tests. I'm not sure how (or if) to address the problem that most notmuch commands are actually invoked via the main binary, but I don't think we have any logic to transform "notmuch foo" to a call to an external binary notmuch-foo. d