From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E0E6DE01EA for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 10:52:03 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.006 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.006 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.005, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uvy-L3rkNpjW for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 10:52:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 971386DE00D2 for ; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 10:52:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c5GvK-0000DU-Bg; Fri, 11 Nov 2016 13:51:38 -0500 Received: (nullmailer pid 6633 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 11 Nov 2016 18:51:56 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Tomi Ollila , Mark Walters , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] emacs: add compatability functions for emacs 23 In-Reply-To: References: <1477736487-31319-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> <8737iy6wt6.fsf@tethera.net> <87zil65f8c.fsf@tethera.net> <87vavu5e6q.fsf@tethera.net> Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:51:56 -0400 Message-ID: <87lgwp6e9f.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 18:52:03 -0000 Tomi Ollila writes: >> 2) It's getting hard to debug emacs23 problems, and developer time is >> scarce, so at the same time, deprecate emacs23 support, so e.g. after >> the next major release we can just drop it. > > It is not hard at all. Just do not mess w/ mixed environments >;). I guess a more accurate way of saying it is that I don't want to spend time on it anymore. So I think I want to deprecate it anyway, with the understanding that we'll keep supporting as long as we (we being someone who is not me) can, but no guarantees. d