From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E926DE1034 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 23:36:42 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.053 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.053 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.077, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GoVgWvn6GgYW for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 23:36:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com (mail-wm0-f68.google.com [74.125.82.68]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52E4E6DE0C81 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 23:36:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-wm0-f68.google.com with SMTP id g23so6901095wme.1 for ; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 23:36:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=6sJfK03H1SA3rK8guQW/4Qw+/NXxFuQiUOZ32GA0Pxo=; b=iLtBgBOBCCDUJT0y3cX8+HDFI/0W4I0xe5HBSL9tsIc7KxX5Awh+L99MH9mTwTg6l/ f/io652g7bc+ZPbIYB1eFA6ZjS9JBKsF0dGSeef3SbKuT8kn5KGD9veBRlrNxzmmU1fN YMnYk/MwYka/Q3fveLKWH7dFj8BTWBDSucNLDub1guMfGkcOTmhV2g1nW2LQdUGMEikq gNsWo8zqLHjZh1Qcs8emEYFZjlqzy5siIyldfBaEarZq5O5CTFvw4nuuQDeTDuAr35HB ZZOYAWj6jeIQCFBvcK0g9VnhmIo80thIvU9CY61GUdTRkWZ7l+piPD7fD6Asoi4VPEDy dsow== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=6sJfK03H1SA3rK8guQW/4Qw+/NXxFuQiUOZ32GA0Pxo=; b=HEVNv5eFNmzGG5deZagD9AKt0TKha0DPyAHR5gqe7zk/sumBo9zdZXCy3YxBo5RUPg keujI9rxh9lUWqyCST+KFUrbGdjQi0tL7864EtqDaU2oZKUXQiA6Da7VQNvwMq7Aqw+G EmrZ4YXfIoFhEPaQUVQVjLVo0mbDZ7q/4YLB8BHGGmJXGHJWPoBmOCwPqij4NBVe7l7u RCVBvNFnDfVpmYxzsdjzi+FCbTYYlva185x8OutF6r2YJLOVe2QwuKnvPYxmIdz8JHDv doDs+t1soVVihR6DYhcu4bxdgXTEUecR5eXrbPdKemoKmj3+6npkZdlHSqCBqvMTE+CF oqPQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvdeU5i/t9bVRU+CdI5bgAKRY/YIOxudjWRPraQLjFJMMhbl3QHvKJio4yEq1u8IEg== X-Received: by 10.28.236.83 with SMTP id k80mr4913363wmh.0.1479022599990; Sat, 12 Nov 2016 23:36:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (5751dfa2.skybroadband.com. [87.81.223.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o62sm21816087wmg.9.2016.11.12.23.36.39 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 12 Nov 2016 23:36:39 -0800 (PST) From: Mark Walters To: Matt Armstrong , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: mua: add a pre-send-check-hook In-Reply-To: References: <1478282419-2771-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 07:36:38 +0000 Message-ID: <87lgwnu8zd.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 07:36:42 -0000 > For consistency with Emacs' own elisp, perhaps rename > notmuch-mua-pre-send-check-hooks to > notmuch-mua-pre-send-check-functions? Hi Yes you are correct. (Annoyingly I had thought about this and thought it was OK since I didn't need to pass an argument. I had missed the return value case). Best wishes Mark