From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51C046DE0941 for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 23:57:48 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.056 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.056 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.056] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2YJ5UJaEUixD for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 23:57:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [162.247.75.118]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586AD6DE01EA for ; Fri, 10 Nov 2017 23:57:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from fifthhorseman.net (dhcp-97f5.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.151.245]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B9E3F99A for ; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 02:57:45 -0500 (EST) Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0B7332047F; Sat, 11 Nov 2017 15:56:56 +0800 (+08) From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor To: Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: Stashed session keys In-Reply-To: <20171025065203.24403-1-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> References: <20171025065203.24403-1-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 15:56:52 +0800 Message-ID: <87lgjd2qpn.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 07:57:48 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On Wed 2017-10-25 02:51:45 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Now that cleartext indexing is merged, let's add the ability to stash > session keys! I'd really appreciate feedback on this series. It works for me, and i'm using it. I don't want this to take another two years to land, if possible. And it blocks additional improvements that i would like to eventually land as well. So any review of any part of this series would be appreciated. I want to make notmuch a mail client that provides actually usable encrypted mail. Regards, --dkg --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEOCdgUepHf6PklTkyFJitxsGSMjcFAloGrUUACgkQFJitxsGS MjdlJA//fXG4EPwIckqnhvCQPz9YTh93f/VJO5XcqcuRg/U06PxjYH+3413a9+r8 KvsOgQXKNTjCPPiAbh0zrvwjUX7Zgp4oaoZTrWSGUitkHXqDFow5Hs9BZgvRccgX JIvSDzB/BJJ6fDVfCV7YzTxVyruIAujeNGHnC9kXkJ9lmpybUKUQkjr/Yh/YMqrm NVCyvT084JF+aSFNwdq1lSzXRw8WY62V6Dfb/QRPkq6X8alVEzAFp28xQEv0Xi6z YdSu4Kin7+L+9cEPLKVlejdJrGX0zPJYtMR5E3f764V4OPZPFH3+iRIFnEu2hFCu gLNWRXinrKpHp1cFGDIunhWNS+toqK6/fy5zSBIimHZS0ovzlkLTGraiBrdJzz9d ODs4u+ExZahpsdrzZeJgU4E8EuUuV18OiE6zTsE7GWg9eaXc5rWQi1+FjrhWsXI/ 7pmZrU0B2lodFxaPeZAjbl2yaSxZrEBIxkrV3up+iCA3H2lbYqvEMX9BQPDxUfka OGxrZ61pJHhZHafjMPXonODJorbCB3j6lf4fFW5xgTNiHKdE302GAH8DWZIEvXvh AD4ZCeTXus2EtBy5kdc4zv9O5mk7nYlCz7Uah/bcn1i8eq53RsTzu+AHJUGw1gqj 2vMcBl3Avg8bFIw5kFdwRrxxY1PPz2qMriMDj1ahWV4V1BAza5s= =6kOg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--