From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B37A6DE0C45 for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 18:26:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.031 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.031 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.031] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SkngaY5v21AT for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 18:26:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [162.247.75.118]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 229F96DE0C3F for ; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 18:26:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from fifthhorseman.net (unknown [38.109.115.130]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 97DD6F99B; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 21:26:30 -0500 (EST) Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B0BA42057E; Tue, 5 Dec 2017 21:12:44 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor To: David Bremner , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/21] crypto: Test restore of cleartext index from stashed session keys In-Reply-To: <877eu2ue89.fsf@tethera.net> References: <20171130085946.11332-1-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> <20171130085946.11332-7-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> <877eu2ue89.fsf@tethera.net> Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2017 21:12:44 -0500 Message-ID: <87lgig61ur.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 02:26:32 -0000 On Mon 2017-12-04 21:59:18 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > Pushed patches 1 to 6. I seem to recall 7 and 8 basically adressed > concerns/suggestions Jamie had, so I'm hoping he can have a quick look > at those. to be fair, i thought Jamie's concerns were correct -- the normalized interface is better. i was only a bit leery about the change introducing an extra delay. But Jamie's concerns were also corroborated by id:87r2szgvik.fsf@tethera.net -- maybe you could ask the author of that message to review? :P I think Jamie is currently slammed by non-notmuch work, unfortunately. --dkg