On Sat 2019-09-14 14:33:56 -0300, David Bremner wrote:
> Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@caltech.edu> writes:
>> Any reason not to move "encrypted" and "signed" to be properties as
>> well?
>
> I guess it would require some client code to be adapted. I'm not sure
> what really relies on those tags other than ad hoc searches.

I think adding a property for "encrypted" and "signed" is a good idea,
but i agree with Bremner that it's unclear how to manage a smooth
transition from tags to properties for these annotations.

A simple patch that proposes the change -- both to code and to the
appropriate parts of notmuch documentation -- might be a good way to get
the conversation started properly.

    --dkg