From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id +C2jBJiuZWNi4gAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 05 Nov 2022 01:30:16 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id UJKCBJiuZWMuwwAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 05 Nov 2022 01:30:16 +0100 Received: from mail.notmuchmail.org (yantan.tethera.net [135.181.149.255]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0B41F51D for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2022 01:30:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.notmuchmail.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0D95F99D; Sat, 5 Nov 2022 00:09:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eggs.gnu.org (eggs.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142:3::10]) by mail.notmuchmail.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 915105E53B for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2022 00:09:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1or6kf-0005Z8-7Y for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 20:09:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-Version:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; bh=6VH7R2h9so6XtVZIgqEoFWsWEVB1sPglAkC9cWaKBPY=; b=R+a1dYsnooq0a39XzhTn XRWIpSnrwDt2fkHOqMD1UCygmyXOeE/rEp22I69xUYo74Nd5pHbOa5aaYSTNTrJmP7QdeM9p2/B31 sJse1BGTgjRCOb0oxv2VgLYMu8wbedE0yf8n8nPLZWoQYxbfjz/DgtNv5G71G3+XA2e1C09nzI9/x kInnz22T4rxzxF1QOnQPXWb3o44IDMkkBfJPyQxYPd5XUx4J9dWSmtcC0x+IF19HsDSx7gjm2CEBz E6c68qpS2RnFD5sUFFa2pBOeYwthTwiFHDgWbJwUvWCgFBD/UMJUNGPqfb2poSS7vlmzKtZ1yMabr 0y/bhUB6OqaIig==; Received: from cpc103048-sgyl39-2-0-cust502.18-2.cable.virginm.net ([92.233.85.247] helo=rivendell.localdomain) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1or6ke-0003B1-MI for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2022 20:09:32 -0400 Received: from localhost (rivendell.localdomain [local]) by rivendell.localdomain (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 43c21d6b for ; Sat, 5 Nov 2022 00:09:28 +0000 (UTC) From: jao To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/1] emacs: notmuch-tree-outline-mode In-Reply-To: <20221104235229.515204-1-jao@gnu.org> (jao@gnu.org's message of "Fri, 4 Nov 2022 23:52:28 +0000") References: <20221104235229.515204-1-jao@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) X-Attribution: jao X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett X-URL: Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2022 00:09:28 +0000 Message-ID: <87leoqb6tj.fsf@mail.jao.io> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID-Hash: MAB6NLHBQCK3VETCPRFZO4KDVZ6BJ5MF X-Message-ID-Hash: MAB6NLHBQCK3VETCPRFZO4KDVZ6BJ5MF X-MailFrom: jao@gnu.org X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-notmuch.notmuchmail.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.3 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: DE ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1667608216; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-owner:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=vdb8BIoZRYu8oHGt51pr/tB4/rqr48zMOmT5v/cueBE=; b=Q6A4n0vXQgNwnlQkvnCgS401voKfE7hw5ZETcSdY2jW1Gb2ZApLg+dGnM5cIH18n1n31Kw sCUaA5Ez3hpQl/mhRcFR5j0h+Bvxnq0IZCYRxVluXICRvyBfn3i1xiBCNp3wLB+npbeH3R h3KSMM56s+2K1Txk9AvlsgrNYGN5hWyPoTEATJkDsnPPrCJUR0MaCUwMrqHLIHiBeZF15m 3Meu3B+4Z37ggY37KbLxouggKpyPgJQaBOoMTVjca65UnH6SCU5zM8c+zkUIl0TeKc6J9w y/e3cMv1/O0aM0L2EYH4KmrGlns132MczO5qNUfAd+6pMwCzN/ggF0yXj3y8Ig== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1667608216; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=r08I50/RdtT6TRQHegW8SBcV6NAz953zGdSwNYkhqiej5y4qlol0HXKGRf/20cFsLbK60+ 4cksvp1AyduG1DOjs90tM0IooK9+IgIVi3NHwWJ3NngyQlHakgYENcOk0NTpaLoIDgzWTY BmX32LEqAdq6+YLFKst/0M9x6taX5gXQHSIqyXSB5ka2bd5mZP+iPlLSpimqUtoc7chHWf Sw6B8cwMOQAQJCrSWhWRYu1jXr2kSR+ifu7swQsl+KFAPT8iWJ6x2cX3IB2B8Oi0WGC9Q5 xlV3c39d09Amx7iAlOozSILpCGgADN9GX/DnYPb/p2i5VSHJDc0v1pP+kVO6KA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("body hash did not verify") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=R+a1dYsn; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gnu.org (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org designates 135.181.149.255 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 6.80 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("body hash did not verify") header.d=gnu.org header.s=fencepost-gnu-org header.b=R+a1dYsn; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gnu.org (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org designates 135.181.149.255 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: C0B41F51D X-Spam-Score: 6.80 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: raDha9CitvIj On Fri, Nov 04 2022, jao wrote: > This is essentiall the same as the previously sent v 6, rebased over > the current master branch. Since that previous version has not > elicited special enthusiasm, yet i use it all the time, so if you guys > think it's not worth integrating into notmuch-emacs upstream, please > just let me know and i'll create a separate ELPA package for it. i am actually going to take that back: my patch modifies only one line of existing code (notmuch-tree.el:1037), to set a new message property. tiny as the change is, it'd be quite complicated to do the same externally, from a package (barring very ugly hacks like an :override advice)... so i guess i'll keep using my private version of notmuch-tree.el if this patch cannot get in :) cheers, jao -- Lower your voice and strengthen your argument. -Lebanese proverb