From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9B1429E26 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:57:11 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.29 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vEk9UguE9bU8 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:57:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBCB2431FB6 for ; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:57:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548D72E50C73; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:57:07 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new Received: from finestructure.net (cpe-76-174-137-84.socal.res.rr.com [76.174.137.84]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins) by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8960B328002; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:57:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3927AB3A; Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:57:03 -0800 (PST) From: Jameson Graef Rollins To: Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-hamburg.de>, Patrick Totzke , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [afew] announcing afew, an universal tagging solution with some fancy features In-Reply-To: References: <4ee8d62a.596ee30a.1833.ffffc33e@mx.google.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.10.2+93~ga124635 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:57:00 -0800 Message-ID: <87k45so36b.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 17:57:12 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:13:51 +0100, Justus Winter <4winter@informatik.uni-h= amburg.de> wrote: > Is your new tag called 'is:new'? Mine is just called 'new' is: is a search prefix, synonymous with tag: > That could be a problem since 'new' as tag for new mails is currently > hardcoded at various locations. I thought it was universally accepted, > but then again hardcoding these things is obviously a bad practice... Tags for new messages is configurable with the new.tags config setting. If you're program needs to know that setting, I suggest it retrieve it From=20the notmuch config directly ("notmuch config get new.tags"). jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJO73rsAAoJEO00zqvie6q8z4YQAK4So77b+7BMzQbwRPdgyXG/ XP9GikEEjBugFzMPYXWuDrf42oa5+fSFHWeY5rB3SDu2XB6Cy5HIiCAQKXlki91a VFJ36xrweB7242rMNIsS9vVKWdIrxh1xkHMz3Ykv4NNEp2kAR+cTTnu3ywJ6s5oj kgYwX7HNW3duoY4RucYoHTiCT/5hVJELayVXH6Ppd7vZkGMtLw90C5jdLdmAeJfK 6vnXiSakMBOctv+/wtUg50DBcHvsd7aLqCmdKvSHekKQCELVXltyR9y/0/w4YMxn TqVMW3ke0pc3R69nVLTRB10Ns+Udrxipk+Pue7sL/OyHZ2+9KkJ/IsPE29cAtH4D z0OQe31QohQvEcmecO/iGjEeMikTxhLA2sEcxELu1+wBw3/JP6RE0/wBSFM7KYyA xadlXVodY/YWXSJg4uc69kwu1qzvJHTkAitx/C/UdXlyMv8FENz8q9YQP2gXnMXE ZtsIvRYf7KWw6Ov46PzTwPOISxZp9ODvUph5xcunQves47JczNeukaakzB3wwtBH CPo55NDkHg/ONQc76tqQ3k7ho/QJnltD34mnbx8Cp1omEY4Qiwu4kKZ29vcNnJSD msbCXu983OV3T9OmOlpjOx0i2r6kAejSltaTso+bW/hNFqGsJMqh1/oqbG5a4n6u BuUkNW9lr3UWObMRNH2F =JXzh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--