From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E576DE0FB1 for ; Fri, 11 May 2018 11:21:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.017 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.017 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.017, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id p1ArpprIFuYH for ; Fri, 11 May 2018 11:21:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [162.247.75.118]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AA656DE0C6B for ; Fri, 11 May 2018 11:21:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fifthhorseman.net (unknown [38.109.115.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF59CF99F; Fri, 11 May 2018 14:21:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3A003211DF; Fri, 11 May 2018 13:42:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor To: David Bremner , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: cope with inline PGP encrypted messages In-Reply-To: <87wowbbs6z.fsf@tethera.net> References: <20171212071553.6440-1-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> <877eoclclp.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> <87wowbbs6z.fsf@tethera.net> Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 13:42:49 -0400 Message-ID: <87k1saf5ra.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 18:21:36 -0000 On Thu 2018-05-10 09:39:32 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > >> Not sure how to best >> represent that in nmbug -- but for now i've removed >> notmuch::needs-review and added notmuch::wip. bremner, let me know if >> you think i should have done something different. > > I also marked the other two patches in the series as WIP; feel free to > remind me they've already been reviewed if/when the whole series is > resubmitted. i think you marked two patches from a different series (the "notmuch show --decrypt=stash" series) as WIP. For the record, that series is not the same as this inline PGP series! I've gone ahead and pushed a v2 of the "notmuch show --decrypt=stash" series, and removed the notmuch::wip tag from the v1 patches, so i think there's nothing to clean up now. just wanted to make it clear that i am still pursuing "notmuch show --decrypt=stash" (i think it's ready for merge actually!) even as i take "inline PGP encryption" back to the shop for repairs. --dkg