From: Marten Veldthuis <marten@veldthuis.com>
To: martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: patchwork test instance (was: Git feature branch)
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2010 12:38:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87iqaf50ln.fsf@marten.rgoc.rug.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100201223112.GA20288@lapse.rw.madduck.net>
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:31:12 +1300, martin f krafft <madduck@madduck.net> wrote:
> Arguably, being patch-centric means that a project has a higher
> barrier of entry, but it also means that if someone wants something,
> they know that they'll have to somehow end up with a patch. The way
> this happens on Git is that you either write it yourself and bring
> it up to discussion (which is what patchwork facilitates), or
> constructively theorise the functionality until someone else
> submits a patch.
And don't forget, if you really want something on the longterm todo
list, you can always send in a patch for the TODO file. ;)
--
- Marten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-02 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-20 14:00 Git feature branch Sebastian Spaeth
2010-01-20 20:00 ` micah anderson
2010-01-22 8:09 ` Sebastian Spaeth
2010-01-22 8:50 ` Sebastian Spaeth
2010-01-22 21:10 ` Carl Worth
2010-01-25 21:32 ` martin f krafft
2010-01-26 0:46 ` sebastian
2010-01-26 22:24 ` micah anderson
2010-01-27 19:17 ` Ben Gamari
2010-02-24 18:58 ` Carl Worth
2010-01-27 19:19 ` Jameson Rollins
2010-01-27 19:41 ` martin f krafft
2010-01-28 7:05 ` James Rowe
2010-02-01 22:31 ` patchwork test instance (was: Git feature branch) martin f krafft
2010-02-02 11:38 ` Marten Veldthuis [this message]
2010-02-10 3:25 ` patchwork test instance martin f krafft
2010-02-10 8:49 ` David Bremner
2010-02-10 22:00 ` martin f krafft
2010-02-10 9:25 ` Sebastian Spaeth
2010-02-10 22:22 ` martin f krafft
2010-02-24 19:10 ` Carl Worth
2010-02-24 20:39 ` martin f krafft
2010-02-24 19:08 ` Carl Worth
2010-02-25 8:06 ` martin f krafft
2010-02-04 3:05 ` Git feature branch Carl Worth
2010-02-04 3:50 ` martin f krafft
2010-02-05 3:36 ` patchwork now auto-updates patches from Git (was: Git feature branch) martin f krafft
2010-02-04 3:58 ` Git feature branch Jameson Rollins
2010-02-24 19:13 ` Carl Worth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://notmuchmail.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87iqaf50ln.fsf@marten.rgoc.rug.nl \
--to=marten@veldthuis.com \
--cc=madduck@madduck.net \
--cc=notmuch@notmuchmail.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://yhetil.org/notmuch.git/
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).