From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD30431FC4 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 04:21:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NgDCSeepqWNp for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 04:21:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEE85431FBC for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 04:21:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034089108.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net ([156.34.89.108] helo=zancas.localnet) by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Sj7MZ-0006OE-0d; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:21:51 -0300 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Sj7MT-0004xR-EX; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:21:41 -0300 From: David Bremner To: Tomi Ollila , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ruby: extern linkage portability improvement In-Reply-To: <1340563714-3103-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi> References: <1340563714-3103-1-git-send-email-tomi.ollila@iki.fi> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 08:21:41 -0300 Message-ID: <87ipefeiwq.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam_bar: - X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:21:58 -0000 Tomi Ollila writes: > Some C compilers are stricter when it comes to (tentative) definition > of a variable -- in those compilers introducing variable without 'extern' > keyword always allocates new 'storage' to the variable and linking all > these modules fails due to duplicate symbols. LGTM