From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900F26DE014D for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:24:58 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.007 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.007 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.004, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LFOR2j61D-YR for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:24:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E9DC6DE0130 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:24:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1beniN-0008N2-HH; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 14:24:51 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 22996 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 30 Aug 2016 18:24:51 -0000 From: David Bremner To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Emacs: postponing messages In-Reply-To: <87h9asef1c.fsf@istari.evenmere.org> References: <87h9asef1c.fsf@istari.evenmere.org> <1465001026-29392-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 15:24:51 -0300 Message-ID: <87inui5d3g.fsf@tesseract.cs.unb.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 18:24:58 -0000 Brian Sniffen writes: > I just found this thread from June while looking to resume a draft saved > from another program (dovecot) and which was given the 'draft' tag by > synchronization from Maildir flags. Mark, thanks! > > I *think* all I have to do to deal with other clients accessing the > Maildir through IMAP is to remove 'Message-ID from message-deletable > headers, because other clients may be watching for that---though this > only matters if the draft is resumed and postponed again, rather than > deleted. > > Does that sound right? > > (when draft > (notmuch-message-unquote-some-mml)) > > One comment here: anyone using maildir flag synchronization will have > items with tag:draft but no quoted MML. To help them reasonably > *discuss* quoted MML, even when working from a mix of notmuch and other > MUAs, can this use a distinct tag? For example, tag:quoted-mml? I'm not sure if Mark saw this, as it wasn't connected to the original thread. d