From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 910396DE107D for ; Sat, 25 May 2019 09:40:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.041 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.041 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.040, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mU3AFWDikeOn for ; Sat, 25 May 2019 09:40:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CB966DE0F21 for ; Sat, 25 May 2019 09:40:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hUZj1-0001vG-RA; Sat, 25 May 2019 12:40:51 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 11486 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 25 May 2019 16:40:57 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] emacs: Drop content-free "Unknown signature status" button In-Reply-To: <20190422171814.16480-3-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> References: <20190422171814.16480-1-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> <20190422171814.16480-3-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> Date: Sat, 25 May 2019 13:40:57 -0300 Message-ID: <87imtymqqu.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 May 2019 16:40:54 -0000 Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > When we have not been able to evaluate the signature status of a given > MIME part, showing a content-free (and interaction-free) "[ Unknown > signature status ]" button doesn't really help the user at all, and > takes up valuable screen real-estate. > > A visual reminder that a given message is *not* signed isn't helpful > unless it is always present, in which case we'd want to see "[ Unknown > signature status ]" buttons on all messages, even ones that don't have > a signing structure, but i don't think we want that. amended version pushed to master d