From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072676DE0F33 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 11:35:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.19 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.19 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.339, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YVWTGp7zRTf3 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 11:35:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-ed1-f41.google.com (mail-ed1-f41.google.com [209.85.208.41]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6ACF6DE0C51 for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 11:35:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-f41.google.com with SMTP id y91so2975376ede.9 for ; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 11:35:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=PGqR61SLJBv3WFk2bPSkxlM/Btbu4QArhiexgz7GVkI=; b=HV057766Tl5tSbRVhXu8veBBgzGozSoVzWdAdMViahT+k7KeMfwsYUQnYfrrlzijfB 34bDbU0hNNVEcZOCQXwQtQ8omAAscoeWevxAg2doM8h6ib/DmAGpyQyGwHv0CbbX+g1K sMc11e9OyKayubGRnM8S5ki7DvEquY6Dzu+H4L5+5pMXpeDi8Pjs7tGftiYlYWLUTv2L a17fz+n2o5AXPJ1LHrmXOJ/T42VZMbrdAJhoAGGn9sfF/mJoRvCBROM3fO96SHNVHcU3 VW/jxtmHrp6jNCW6Wlken9K6HOTv/SDa+TKFJQQO8/saQbgDepaB2gz0FiW5CzKGNhmf mTAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:mime-version; bh=PGqR61SLJBv3WFk2bPSkxlM/Btbu4QArhiexgz7GVkI=; b=OSsbsTght3b8qhUCFnp1Vh9D+t7THumJNd4mq0xjDgPxpPaVEZw0T3NW1z8UtP0MZK 8qifMskAHCESIObRDKjGq+XN3/S/ac53kE6elb9MUqc0oflzWfMzDU4dEbcq5hoWmWp0 tMJfXjUZC0W1zOlQh2sqgoACfuYN1IEnwgi4qBt16jdQW2j/raEZ4aj7CsPVaQt2JdFn YKJa6vm7ZENgRI1WMtfnpTq9a5R4f549yIWm9GqV7hM0aZz/HrFe4J233zLHwIo1Mz7X MJjsy4AxM5wpEebY9g6z/+yx3dQiOAA0bceP+SzuG9rw923KZ+eHDBU1frTVdnOBvGfu QaZg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVOVsC8H3Z+glpcnLnfRF93BMOfK8FBXzm5DUVRd85g4ovw1BfB g06rQxfK2rdF46LZk6MriCQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzL8C2zy6jK2Lq5v7aMFy8Xe3iljzq/uJ2NB75XsoNDR0cX8FlLp6smhTV4X6BOPIRsAuU9oA== X-Received: by 2002:a50:eb42:: with SMTP id z2mr4284823edp.291.1570646097245; Wed, 09 Oct 2019 11:34:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from powell.devork.be ([2a02:168:59e9::7a3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s9sm347842ejf.44.2019.10.09.11.34.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 09 Oct 2019 11:34:56 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Floris Bruynooghe Received: (nullmailer pid 15860 invoked by uid 1000); Wed, 09 Oct 2019 18:34:55 -0000 From: Floris Bruynooghe To: David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Python3 cffi bindings In-Reply-To: <87eezmeuz9.fsf@tethera.net> References: <20191008210312.20685-1-flub@devork.be> <87eezmeuz9.fsf@tethera.net> Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 20:34:55 +0200 Message-ID: <87imoxu5rk.fsf@powell.devork.be> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2019 18:35:02 -0000 On Tue 08 Oct 2019 at 19:24 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > Floris Bruynooghe writes: >> Anyway, I found the code, checked things work, updated tests on new >> python versions, added a very basic intergration with the test >> framework and squashed the commits. Otherwise the attached patch >> is just a plain dump of the current state so interested people have >> at least a copy of the code again which can be made to work. > > I think you missed the attachement. Other than that, sounds interesting ;). I used git send-email as per the contributing nodes, so it was supposed to be a followup email. It does seem like I got a message back saying the patch mail is being held in the moderator queue as it's too large... Perhaps you have moderation powers? Cheers, Floris