From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id YI/PImOrsV6RSQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 05 May 2020 18:07:31 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id CFYXA2+rsV6BeQAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 05 May 2020 18:07:43 +0000 Received: from arlo.cworth.org (arlo.cworth.org [50.126.95.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA0AB940F2E for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 18:07:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892156DE10E7; Tue, 5 May 2020 11:07:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IH7_KL4-jNx7; Tue, 5 May 2020 11:07:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arlo.cworth.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361416DE1378; Tue, 5 May 2020 11:07:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9156DE1378 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 11:07:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2PUKmXGLol5e for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 11:07:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB41A6DE10E7 for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 11:07:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jW1yQ-000886-5k; Tue, 05 May 2020 14:07:18 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 105347 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 05 May 2020 18:07:16 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Tomi Ollila , Daniel Kahn Gillmor , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: Handle PKCS#7 S/MIME messages In-Reply-To: References: <20200430201328.725651-1-dkg@fifthhorseman.net> <87a72nv7cx.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 15:07:16 -0300 Message-ID: <87imhamf1n.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org Sender: "notmuch" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: -1.01 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org designates 50.126.95.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [-1.01 / 13.00]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.46500140109899]; DWL_DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[50.126.95.6:from]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 27017(-0.18), country: US(-0.00), ip: 50.126.95.6(-0.47)]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+a]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: notmuchmail.org]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[50.126.95.6:server fail]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:27017, ipnet:50.126.64.0/18, country:US]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[david@tethera.net,notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[iki.fi:email,notmuchmail.org:email]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; SPF_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[-0.44080743020042]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[notmuch@notmuchmail.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[tethera.net]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[8]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-TUID: lhnZgu250bVt Tomi Ollila writes: > Reproducer in case gmime version is less than 3.2.7 -- with newer > gmimes that has to work so if that ever broke in newer gmimes we'd > notice (reproducer could hide that). > >> >> Any other suggestions? >> I guess it depends how many distros you think will patch this. It's not so hard for distros to patch and / or skip a test. I think Daniel is in the best position to judge this. If it's just Debian, then we can handle it. If it's everyone, then that is probably a less good tradeoff. d