From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C96431FB6 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:16:40 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ppkLePqdTFYU for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:16:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from defaultvalue.org (defaultvalue.org [70.85.129.156]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E9D431FB5 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:16:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from omen.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A400B90D35; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:17:06 -0600 (CST) Received: from raven.defaultvalue.org (raven.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by omen.defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665895010C; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:16:13 -0600 (CST) Received: by raven.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 57ED37BA375; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:16:13 -0600 (CST) From: Rob Browning To: Jameson Rollins Subject: Re: [Review] Re: new "crypto" branch providing full PGP/MIME support References: <4CF15D67.1070904@fifthhorseman.net> <87aak08fu8.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87fwsf9mip.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87tygl29vu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87oc5yi9us.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87d3mdvjwz.fsf@bookbinder.fernseed.info> <87k4gk70ng.fsf@SSpaeth.de> <87sjv8i7v6.fsf@irigaray.ross.mayfirst.org> <87sjv86mp9.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <4D6BF0AA.3070706@fifthhorseman.net> <874o7o6ih5.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <4D6C00C7.9000705@fifthhorseman.net> <8739n75zdb.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 21:16:13 -0600 In-Reply-To: <8739n75zdb.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> (Jameson Rollins's message of "Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:49:19 -0800") Message-ID: <87hbbno7ia.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: notmuch X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2011 03:16:40 -0000 Jameson Rollins writes: > If folks have suggestions for disambiguating tag names that don't > themselves create further confusion on some other front, then I'm > inclined to just go with the simplest and most straightforward tag name. Are persistent tags required here? The original question at least, seemed to just be asking for a visual indicator that a message has encrypted or signed bits. So I wondered if that might be accomplished without actual tags. Just curious. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4