From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD56429E27 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:14:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.3 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O2rFI+R5ey6R for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:14:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7901429E21 for ; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 16:14:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zancas.localnet (fctnnbsc36w-156034064058.pppoe-dynamic.High-Speed.nb.bellaliant.net [156.34.64.58]) (authenticated bits=0) by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9ANEUdH007073 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 10 Oct 2011 20:14:32 -0300 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RDP3G-0007y3-Nt; Mon, 10 Oct 2011 20:14:30 -0300 From: David Bremner To: Brian May Subject: Re: emacs email appears empty In-Reply-To: References: <87lit7r4la.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.9~rc2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 20:14:30 -0300 Message-ID: <87hb3gphgp.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: notmuch X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 23:14:37 -0000 On Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:02:48 +1100, Brian May wrote: > I also have attached an email with nothing but the signature. This > email comes out completely blank without any option to see the > signature. Not sure if this is expected or not. > I can confirm the latter is a bug in 0.9~rc2 David