From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E1D6DE13A3 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 13:52:13 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.78 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.78 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.780] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EWDbN4UC1R45 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 13:52:12 -0800 (PST) X-Greylist: delayed 582 seconds by postgrey-1.35 at arlo; Thu, 05 Nov 2015 13:52:12 PST Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [209.234.253.108]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F36C6DE1320 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 13:52:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from fifthhorseman.net (y125068.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [118.243.125.68]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A0F9F984; Thu, 5 Nov 2015 16:42:27 -0500 (EST) Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 143851FFB7; Fri, 6 Nov 2015 06:42:26 +0900 (JST) From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor To: Matthew Lear , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: notmuch-emacs: forward messages inline In-Reply-To: <430FC760-8BF5-4798-89B5-E7F2A16564B7@bubblegen.co.uk> References: <430FC760-8BF5-4798-89B5-E7F2A16564B7@bubblegen.co.uk> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2015 06:42:26 +0900 Message-ID: <87h9l0qg1p.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 21:52:14 -0000 Hi Matt-- On Fri 2015-11-06 04:51:53 +0900, Matthew Lear wrote: > Are there any recommended ways to selectively forward an email as > inline with notmuch-emacs rather than as an RFC822 attachment, eg have > a new shortcut key that can be used for this purpose in addition to f? > I have toggled one of the mml configuration variables (I forget > exactly what it was) which switched the forwarding method to inline > (ACAICT this also removed the ability of being able to forward as > RFC822), but it also included various header information in the body > of the email. Not good. I suppose you could reply to the message (r) and just change the addresses, which would include the previous message "inline". If you don't like that it leaks the previous message-id in the In-Reply-To and References headers, you can just kill them from the buffer manually. But can i ask why you'd want this? forwarded messages as RFC 822 attachments are significantly more sane for any MUA to deal with. --dkg