From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119226DE141B for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 05:16:05 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.307 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.244, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.55, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ManZFxpW4wZX for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 05:16:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5BC86DE02C9 for ; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 05:16:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aVfTL-0002lb-VN; Tue, 16 Feb 2016 08:15:20 -0500 Received: (nullmailer pid 26072 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:16:00 -0000 From: David Bremner To: "W. Trevor King" Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: nmbug in the Debian packages? In-Reply-To: <20160213220250.GB4265@odin.tremily.us> References: <87twlj8mix.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <20160208193804.GE4265@odin.tremily.us> <87lh6o79vb.fsf@zancas.localnet> <20160213220250.GB4265@odin.tremily.us> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.21+26~g9404723 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.5.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 09:16:00 -0400 Message-ID: <87h9h8vlrj.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 13:16:05 -0000 "W. Trevor King" writes: > > I'd floated notmuch-dtag earlier [1]. Does that sound right? Or do > folks prefer another name? > I had a thought about this. The password manager "pass" uses pass git {push|pull} for git related operations. Perhaps that would make sense for us as well? So initially "notmuch-git". I'm of course open to better ideas, but especially since you pushed a bit to make the interface follow git more closely, perhaps that's a more informative name than "dtag". It also leaves open the possibility of stashing other metadata than tags, should something like [1] come to pass. On the other hand, it's true that what we're doing is less transparent than what pass does, which is really just pass the arguments straight through to git. [1] id:1453561198-2893-2-git-send-email-david@tethera.net