From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 150A66DE1353 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:56:52 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.055 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.055 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.055] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3CK_x4S-4fsE for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:56:51 -0800 (PST) X-Greylist: delayed 334 seconds by postgrey-1.35 at arlo; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:56:51 PST Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [162.247.75.118]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC396DE1352 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:56:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from fifthhorseman.net (unknown [38.109.115.130]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EBA02F98C; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 15:51:14 -0500 (EST) Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0F839201A7; Tue, 22 Nov 2016 15:49:40 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor To: Marius Bakke , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: T350 test failures with gnupg-2.1.16 In-Reply-To: <87shqj5nha.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <87shqj5nha.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 15:49:37 -0500 Message-ID: <87h96zi6ji.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 20:56:52 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On Tue 2016-11-22 14:22:09 -0500, Marius Bakke wrote: > T350-crypto: Testing PGP/MIME signature verification and decryption > PASS emacs delivery of signed message > FAIL signature verification > --- T350-crypto.2.expected 2016-11-22 18:59:48.341851653 +0000 > +++ T350-crypto.2.output 2016-11-22 18:59:48.341851653 +0000 > @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ > "id": 2 > }, > { > - "content-length": 280, > + "content-length": 312, > "content-type": "application/pgp-signature", > "id": 3 > } If you could get me a copy of the actual application/pgp-signature part, i'd be interested in looking at it. Unlike bremner, i'm actually able to duplicate this problem on debian sid, so i'll see what i can figure out. --dkg --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQKTBAEBCgB9FiEE7bLnT1b88rZyl7c1JOz/Wv9oNwoFAlg0r2FfFIAAAAAALgAo aXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3BlbnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEVE QjJFNzRGNTZGQ0YyQjY3Mjk3QjczNTI0RUNGRjVBRkY2ODM3MEEACgkQJOz/Wv9o Nwp2XQ/+Mypoi7h9OwHUCjX2zYAv7dwUBEaX3ygP2LF2N3d78Wq7O9D731TLWHMA 2x832xz0N0KB+AGDchsw2n5DMuipt4tOx4GuGRdOLS5Xs6NQI2X/t2tQVB9mNs7p X43lXI/3v2kPdIKfX6i969g+eYpifaMVyQ/S1ZkmQ4qeIYG8QrTAUG1ICSJl9gfw LoiAap56h79RjKUKhr6k7vP7L3i59X0+Z0Euc9cGucw9Gjy6+09+vMG85arqLHnG Y6NXIvXWga66XmG9LTziQ5qsucShkbSCHh5in/TZSdfIuKg9Z7u7W3voYx0DFo3g Q52vxC4/nsgLvj54e78h+kLyR2dFrgA4pUyEfMn1HkeHOQBVF9IsjhwXk3oYFquH +o+DzgzeCFcuaj7lxJUN+4sq73h4cyD0Ky1S99tzmHbsg2Sfui0+VSpuA3+Tx6kD wn94arsG2aUO4pko4++Vef1ruPVJdgXKyFP0vkaUmT6REGdYZU5Ql2o0RZUZW3cW A1F5c2kAwZsYnMLXM4pDoLok5slrG4aRnUwFU6YkHUaaooH4qIrPi5VnKCsBnCZe V7itgMT5z27aAR2p8qNqruccSh8z4g0KUWgtdkHFFMBn72PONeqLl9HWujvMHCjp +jSCGTE8eZDHPeXH5PB31cKpt6MCYMJTHFhnXol4X3IUbB2gp9s= =iRGA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--