From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20A5D6DE12DE for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 05:19:24 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.051 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.051 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.050, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jliLIYoGv0kD for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 05:19:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72D606DE129E for ; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 05:19:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hoRr2-0007TF-Or; Fri, 19 Jul 2019 08:19:16 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 5875 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 19 Jul 2019 12:19:13 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Teemu Likonen , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Emacs: UI problems with messages excluded by several tags In-Reply-To: <87ftn31r9h.fsf@iki.fi> References: <87ftn31r9h.fsf@iki.fi> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 09:19:13 -0300 Message-ID: <87h87ip67y.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2019 12:19:24 -0000 Teemu Likonen writes: > *notmuch-hello* buffer has "All tags" section which lists how many > messages there are for every tag. However, if a message has two > different excluding tags (like "spam" and "deleted") then that message > is not shown anywhere in the "All tags" list. The message count does not > show it and the message does not show in the search when user clicks the > tag. I'm not sure I follow you. It seems like this should be the behaviour also if the message is tagged with one exclude tag; i.e. it sounds like it is working as I expect. Can you explain how 2 exclude tags makes a difference for you? d