From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id sNeyCwgoUWdIfgAA62LTzQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 05 Dec 2024 04:11:52 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1.migadu.com with LMTPS id sNeyCwgoUWdIfgAA62LTzQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 05 Dec 2024 05:11:52 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("body hash did not verify") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=OuU3oXlK; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org designates 135.181.149.255 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1733371911; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=T2s/i1BvEZcwRUjbYSxKCe2ihsrpkDpnwMD3nJQdqCyEQVYPpGk8XPh0PQFgAHTvBwwJQs bXHWlwWvx+3T3mkxa9zJzA4cgDS2n05mBoffTIW5A+x9IW1sJBtoQf0GZBViWkJBe0SE3u C1o5GYCUOGajVQzIMvvUQ7GGaUfPmEQS+BDJ7PBUNIX2Yf/8CI1ESIloiWWPT4pxG/OV2w szyM/yKLyST8V1Cf9kzrXw90+DGdznVDUNknNJwmBQkILZrJZTGlsi1xwjvP5kraHwMLi0 pjWeDi83FIKZnBvIUpFn9RzKhgDZmV30+jA+SvnVYLcE6oUWSgG/jrNsyVuV0w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("body hash did not verify") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=OuU3oXlK; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org designates 135.181.149.255 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1733371911; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-owner:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=DyJUnfMQlZ/i5hmXyP//xhnKedQhFmGk19VBMUmkMhE=; b=Rq2GiaTqWZrF0Ln3ykQw94ZS8A17xJdRh0LysaHYk9orlMQi1p8zOCUlArp6Co7blfx1op vtfvpaVzSYGf3xGjfplPjSxqAwRGXjrk4R+JARhKrOd2cFdg9RS7z9dGZUZTZvIN2K1tJV lyIfRwWV5GKB4HFhqZtJW7iSTe7isEdZLpBKUwMO5VTwNPl2X0gZ0F/Qesa4xQhYScKIHx 6SixrleWf4O7ZVl9GRN71x1BdgWAXEUL6sjtlhYNtC0NAAb7F7lSqUzK83BVkiGq1Gv4Jz H+kFzs4tlSlyNcBXRY9AAr7M98574J4gaCe614HGmfZNAwb6yEUdlAOxFO+Irg== Received: from mail.notmuchmail.org (yantan.tethera.net [135.181.149.255]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F87660F24 for ; Thu, 05 Dec 2024 05:11:51 +0100 (CET) Received: from yantan.tethera.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.notmuchmail.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6F45F7BD; Thu, 5 Dec 2024 04:03:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pj1-x1032.google.com (mail-pj1-x1032.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1032]) by mail.notmuchmail.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96E395E50F for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2024 04:03:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pj1-x1032.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2ee50ffcf14so1337953a91.0 for ; Wed, 04 Dec 2024 20:03:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1733371386; x=1733976186; darn=notmuchmail.org; h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9Pog+b8Fi8sQR33nOu0kSO5Ld2Ihd8d4RFhLkljxqzs=; b=OuU3oXlK9SBPjHBKTu9KV0KKgQqeftpfsUViQ4bjSOkRRaHrkO31PWV4VV25M6QKIM S2cSNOSW1motG2VG1BvxhCZ7r0+tJ6js223dXV42dq4prviSAltpO+BUa2PjR2ffcX8F 5CRhxh4tCgJBtRY5e5eHvaaiMbaqw4om8lZ2utHjpqjlTnn0Ak4AOzwT2feE/xtrPKva jAOqP6n0w6HM9PVQliPOQ4iX5dFQivrpqCzNhg9QjkdRTPH8nuFKHeM9Rsz6LcVg41oh lv7igtXrm5KpNk3HLAZi1qw6VX92Du/G6nxAzhzQflOdmRPWWCidyjUW2AWGwn2mfgHL lDKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1733371386; x=1733976186; h=mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=9Pog+b8Fi8sQR33nOu0kSO5Ld2Ihd8d4RFhLkljxqzs=; b=Oy98FuhrtUJ+uHLQKLD1US8lShu4hCDrEbQxpBpRg6mZkVoNDtKFsDS6DsXi7onakb idDllgskSqo95A7XpKV58eyK0gELDeymVlV0Z2tZpZIwr1B/mfafiQHXQO9FAy6UGptq p6hcBCcipmX3n9w6umnXjb7Vdr6KsuA2VN98JeKeZ2K/1vXdEfj/W7+WiNgQA0OqT3Yp M1nI46fk/gZnk+Y9rTKhGp6Fe6QKeJ4VZzZVrLPbJO5/ZL9LMSJEZJAed8WvwQH8HVuH 0UrxBgekYJKclIey/hZomiVOQVGfSrCOhirW9KXseaVw8SamWKJeKPqVgg8al3Gpub5G 5uWA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXnBQsaty1KgYIRxcgHYqqQPF7b3mTxcgihZuGuqN4GhHdq9OoKtaXbMqJwaH1E0I9rYq9wFctC@notmuchmail.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw67bZgsOmBayNLFxinHSwTBFrU7Mc+utVj9oM4pgL9PKHO8VH1 5XVsHh8LkpfJ//lse0NlVPrdIt0XM5vg9fsQ+4dndnKbFiyT53xO X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncsy6DsT0m/TeG70qW4znfOGNjXvX09G/RuDLm15n6sBc6BIqQdhg4G02YkoMzM X4hQkBa7CWzBwrWCdqvCQaYUNC/SxKOMzWw4d71iXZdRkBh69B/6R11c+1LBUkhUSvTJtRDgycz jE+bqAwhTsOAlF/NRkz/RVGy5NrlAvsEAkxSJb1Nr/u3R9kgFl6DdR6LOd6NPwA3MSx3t4eEGm1 1EPzZo6hFvHvknrQvgO+u+AA4vM8tWYyBMM/Zuv5hXSnOLnWlYLGo6s9p6EEW2h6u+NXiS/jObe Iv2nCDbv X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHI8Im1w+WD93OHFff4SvQDqnquXaQNfQoJ8ZiCQ2Zw2GA/jIVdkKFz/i6jvj8Kbx9zeu9q1Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:39ce:b0:2ea:7bdd:f320 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2ef41bbac63mr2869215a91.1.1733371385754; Wed, 04 Dec 2024 20:03:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from debian-hx90 (syn-076-094-249-045.res.spectrum.com. [76.94.249.45]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-2ef2708b921sm2244354a91.45.2024.12.04.20.03.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 04 Dec 2024 20:03:05 -0800 (PST) From: Xiyue Deng To: Sean Whitton Subject: Re: Anyone interested in python-pgpy? In-Reply-To: <87mshaoo0r.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> References: <875xo2u70p.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <87ed2pu64q.fsf@debian-hx90.lan> <87v7w1qysu.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <87y10wsk2d.fsf@debian-hx90.lan> <87ser3st5v.fsf@debian-hx90.lan> <87mshaoo0r.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.38.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/29.4 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2024 20:03:02 -0800 Message-ID: <87h67isrnt.fsf@debian-hx90.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID-Hash: AZCCVBSHJEJY2PXIQOBP5W5MIVXAXG5X X-Message-ID-Hash: AZCCVBSHJEJY2PXIQOBP5W5MIVXAXG5X X-MailFrom: manphiz@gmail.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-notmuch.notmuchmail.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: debian-python@lists.debian.org, notmuch@notmuchmail.org, mailscripts@packages.debian.org, Daniel Kahn Gillmor X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.3 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5376843957161839945==" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: DE X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.46 X-Spam-Score: -1.46 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 9F87660F24 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-TUID: aSqmqDBmq9BZ --===============5376843957161839945== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sean Whitton writes: > Hello, > > On Wed 04 Dec 2024 at 01:18am -08, Xiyue Deng wrote: > >> Looks like this has nothing to do with Python version but gpgme: I have >> tested with a snapshot of gpgme1.0 version 1.18.0-6+b1 and everything >> works; upgrading to version 1.23.2-5 and the tests start to show the >> same errors. I have been trying to see what has changed from gpgme side >> but so far nothing conclusive yet. >> >> On the other hand, python-pgpy may be working fine as all failures in >> the tests are caused by using the gpgme python binding, which somehow >> doesn't like the PGP signed message generated by python-pgpy anymore. > > So the bug has nothing to do with the python 3.13 transition, in fact? > No. To be clear, python 3.13 + gpgme1.0 1.18.0-6+b1 works. It should be the change in gpgme that caused this. > I think that means its severity should be changed. > > I guess you're not sure yet whether or not it should be reassigned to > pgpme? > As the gpgme unit tests are passing, I'm not quite sure whether gpgme should be in the blame, yet. It could be that the pgpy use should be adjusted. I still need more time to figure this out as it's been a busy week. Still hope that someone more familiar with the matter can take a look sooner than me :) > --=20 > Sean Whitton =2D-=20 Regards, Xiyue Deng --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJGBAEBCgAwFiEEiKQfd6o81mjI+LWALell7WOCXJMFAmdRJfYSHG1hbnBoaXpA Z21haWwuY29tAAoJEC3pZe1jglyTZ9AP/icPor5FpKmVdQv6glc02myMUfgC5Ng7 WMQWqzT7MZ2J1MfONSGQtzg+FiQpayVkyVTMGmc5IFxhjsKZiR+MronZ40tm34Ol WH2asX8uGJr6SCMsLK/1fZwTq9LoOoMFD3L6s4qEwBfpeureAolN6wtB5dnYxX1L 95rfOhA6vkZodSM5P9Gc1eBvEHa5p7EG2sHWgM8rOUIawTAmkkcpGmwJHQ3DSz2A Zafn9cilA9lZFaRNF/e4V4N6xC7xmTFj6YBPbv+hOKfg+qdhNQ7REvYBnlmCRJgW SMuarHnGQJ6nwdF0HpFseNPsAuFM0vlyzTcN+5tZ7QD5gqbMLxAOt3PLV7oMaUYW JNMsEXnEQsSWilX/n0OJ29f3hc+6APPCFLHZosBdZwMXDD4/yYIgMJtsdrfMrESn K8GF8JIWQdvFQtQI3PKjjuudYg71WmVLn5u0dQILx6MJkZX+eh+Q/lqrTOC/lUmL 7EIj7oRhdP9B3iu5Cfon0NRCIIXBFzIGIC00l0eRjwKqSG2OQrk6UFh0588FBvz8 1UD/ZZzY9bY7oeA8JdvrnieGctz/EE2uku1m5NObbxjnayix8u0Hfy67hOn8Dsb5 EZMec+h/wXUmgbKpjc1M6FDxb/Us8AaO5tF8HkTzLHVNGU+OXNqracof+qQmUidr /UwHCVJQjJ2d =ONXM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- --===============5376843957161839945== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline --===============5376843957161839945==--