From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D76AD431FB6 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:29:15 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vKbbmnh+3QY7 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:29:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from tarap.cc.columbia.edu (tarap.cc.columbia.edu [128.59.29.7]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0C9431FB5 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:29:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from servo.finestructure.net (cpe-76-166-146-235.socal.res.rr.com [76.166.146.235]) (user=jgr2110 author=jrollins@servo.finestructure.net mech=PLAIN bits=0) by tarap.cc.columbia.edu (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p1PLTC6T010203 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:29:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from jrollins by servo.finestructure.net with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pt5Ds-0003rA-DR for notmuch@notmuchmail.org; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:29:12 -0800 From: Jameson Rollins To: "notmuch\@notmuchmail.org" Subject: Re: Strange match to my query In-Reply-To: <3wd8vx3u91o.fsf@testarossa.amd.com> References: <3wd4o8wa7fx.fsf@testarossa.amd.com> <878vx4vuxi.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <3wd8vx3u91o.fsf@testarossa.amd.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-102-ge86ac1d (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:29:05 -0800 Message-ID: <87fwrbhkgu.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-No-Spam-Score: Local X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 128.59.29.7 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 21:29:16 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 13:57:23 -0700, Mark Anderson = wrote: > It shouldn't match anything, that's the value of finding this bug. >=20 > What happened is the term counter was reset for each email address, so > the term list for emails in "to:" looks something like this: >=20 > 0 c K > 1 hello R > 2 com goodbye > 3 com >=20 > So it matched a hello at 1 and a goodbye at 2. I see now. I was confused about which problem you were reporting. So I am in fact still seeing this bug, although I am ostensibly using a version that includes the patch to fix it (db70f3f0). Does this fix require rebuilding the database? jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNaB8iAAoJEO00zqvie6q8nbIQAJZB2ydTIFKMkUNlhPNsikoK Ge5X7zszSILiotq+DEuXFQVakvgnPelrngWNY1CTjCU1TZdJ89K1709lmYo3vzH1 OKVgaNt0RbBKyB8vuhib1ksHaWr6R9+GN8CuD/5ao5q7F858GRYDGIswoIwTOc6a 2Ll+6VUSbmltH5Klx3MOh4rancy02RTXu2Hn+F1fPdmDSl9WlJ9WDLFcY0dAKTXB eJfZbQh6+yHMPZGd/5axWpFa01bgPKOioEHqsdrmHoXGz/Z6mP6zIGo4AU93cGJG sDddflDsPx4oNGtXI+AErRHrdhbdJok7/nUCxiC8DRJTDIHEAI9wk03EzkySqaDe 87dzXy7k6WhEPgw1UpI7ZlQzQlqggLkHSk59FKL7iV/Of+2ZjI5lQ/5Yra0NZpNl AWSil2F5emoqp6dqdDZFiOur3MPKIh+N2W6hep+kvNFjm1pNw0yorD61RXJ7Jmnv pJxuTCDi2dpdCGaLHAfjacErjEVr5sgHsdXpQB7DpDV2BvwQo25WDebAuclxUyuK YjvkjMz/umtjWIkcO//lmQKomlOhaIpSmB9W0xTi208SZPzjjB9RspW+3qlSKAW3 dfz5CdMhd762jiQkjXhg9szYZfhvQflVgLw13fRADLcvT4Y2j1AFOqKh7hpm+ru2 gzqnR1VqJEdP3M+UgNnH =V3lP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--