From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A57B431FB6 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:21:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.29 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.29 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=unavailable Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Na52EeofCEAe for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:21:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu (outgoing-mail.its.caltech.edu [131.215.239.19]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D9A431FAF for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:21:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fire-doxen.imss.caltech.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire-doxen-postvirus (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0A2D2E508EC; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:21:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Scanned: at Caltech-IMSS on fire-doxen by amavisd-new Received: from finestructure.net (m17.ligo.caltech.edu [131.215.115.117]) (Authenticated sender: jrollins) by fire-doxen-submit (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F042E50B75; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:21:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by finestructure.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C2C3EAE6; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:21:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Jameson Graef Rollins To: Philip Hands , Jesse Rosenthal , David Bremner , Carl Worth , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Restore original keybinding ('r' = reply-to-all) In-Reply-To: <87hatv4e37.fsf@poker.hands.com> References: <1340815565-21083-1-git-send-email-cworth@cworth.org> <87obo4zljq.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> <87hatwqoz9.fsf@maritornes.cs.unb.ca> <87ehozmpcq.fsf@jhu.edu> <87hatv4e37.fsf@poker.hands.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2+54~ga0426dc (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:21:11 -0700 Message-ID: <87fw9fwgp4.fsf@servo.finestructure.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 16:21:22 -0000 --=-=-= On Thu, Jun 28 2012, Philip Hands wrote: > Actually, instead of either of these options, how about some way of > letting r do the single reply, and then once inside the reply, having > some key binding to add the rest of the recipients in the group, or flip > between the two options so one can change one's mind after typing up the > reply? This is a good idea. The other idea I had was to have 'r' query the user directly about whether or not they want to reply all before constructing the reply template. Or right before you're about to send. jamie. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJP7IR3AAoJEO00zqvie6q814AP/i+Xxb0KBO3ciQcdfcuOk5eh +Z60q0VJfE2COB49pHxuWWa8cB3BDo6Ymjpjnd1HNdDeZB4+G0AI5/yA1EEAfAVJ 099zRvF0yEqoVFWFPutp8V1tLhQeUEFjDsvkqfJnu+d8nHUuAyzwtMU6LRTtdLlj o0v9LJG2u10ihtOsFXbVHj4ZmetOrkH5g24NLVjSdYKZtCB7MpfcgQ1MGjfgAFqW mOHTpi2ADEYp5cBST42NYaOW82X+yKyLQFC8rp05tNNRvFu/868XggArI+UiclI0 GUSpr2dfXXU1Iq2PiJ5sNgLNpNVqZ48HGJoyLqv9VCL28AZdqWn/z+wFkNSU7cjr fybLc4psPTibWfCUVNL84ErazubWiLX1xXnH/RFUy6Oqtnyia1QAnIvJZzlEoxOk KYLohPAQsRdzN0hCVgFS6GF5/JUE600NeQAR86mbGfbN7C8YiLnxbEsNNEqkVKyh 8bjjyLi868wXyiOV7p7KilUc6/TTunvcQK21w80M8u1bc9+gQZXXd7lQ5KY9PhXv UXgMaEMmSnavWzTntiIDSLhNo7wd773jTRc+uC2JzEddfk62MmG3Td8f1dQiQOC/ x5nmYlYmBznaHpboTJ2WmnlvmvFqlI/vqU2j2UvFT41PszhbaeFFKs4QQnXg5iRu eZuy13FGFq4YyMywWilw =LQjL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--