From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D96F431FAF for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:17:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CLReelzY2XTk for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:17:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arlo.cworth.org (arlo.cworth.org [50.126.95.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB166431FAE for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:17:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0474A6DE00B2; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:17:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DAE6DC43A90; Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:17:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Carl Worth To: Felipe Contreras , David Bremner Subject: Re: [PATCH] debian: package ruby bindings In-Reply-To: References: <1365031678-25188-1-git-send-email-felipe.contreras@gmail.com> <87y5clte1j.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87wqs4rsjm.fsf@zancas.localnet> <878v48om5u.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87a9oiw2pc.fsf@zancas.localnet> <871u9twrj2.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:16:58 -0700 Message-ID: <87fvy9kxr9.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:49:17 -0700 Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:17:14 -0000 --=-=-= Felipe Contreras writes: >> My hypothetical laziness is not the reason. It was at the strong >> insistence of Carl that things are organized this way. > > I still don't see why we need to do that. The notmuch project > shouldn't be bound to the debian project. I'm not sure what your specific question is here. My strong insistence was that the Debian packaging stuff, (like debian/rules), be hosted in the main notmuch repository. If that were separated to a separate repository (or a separate branch), then nothing in the current situation would change. Your proposed change, (which is to debian/rules if I read it correctly), would instead be directed at that separate repository/branch. And either way, David's currently the person to decide what lands there. Is there anything I'm missing here? -Carl --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlF+uRoACgkQ6JDdNq8qSWhSEgCgoHzNfy4kkKzWAyfgCmGHcCb/ CjkAoIAl1e0qs9fbe8UzfVYVGRS0Hpwi =mNcf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--