From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095AA6DE18FB for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 05:37:11 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.005 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.005 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FvusR2gww28j for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 05:37:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67D7C6DE184F for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 05:37:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmhC5-0003wn-QR; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 08:36:25 -0500 Received: (nullmailer pid 12569 invoked by uid 1000); Sat, 11 Mar 2017 13:37:05 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Mark Walters , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] emacs: remove use of message-send-hook In-Reply-To: <87y3wcobxc.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> References: <1479416079-6319-1-git-send-email-markwalters1009@gmail.com> <87k27wsnct.fsf@tethera.net> <87y3wcobxc.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 09:37:05 -0400 Message-ID: <87fuikrl32.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 13:37:11 -0000 Mark Walters writes: > Hi > >> Would it be possible to concatenate the two lists and only call >> notmuch-tag once? It seems like that should be notably faster. > > I think that it's not possible as they are tagging different > messages. We could probably do something with --batch but that would > mean some change in notmuch-tag itself. Ah right, I missed the fact that an id was returned as well from the two invoked functions. Nevermind then.