From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE02D6DE0119 for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:04:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.011, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WNuETtgZ8JHI for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:04:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 644966DE010F for ; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 18:04:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1di9B3-00084t-5J; Wed, 16 Aug 2017 21:00:49 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 17346 invoked by uid 1000); Thu, 17 Aug 2017 01:04:19 -0000 From: David Bremner To: notmuch@notmuchmail.org, notmuch@freelists.org Subject: Re: unread flag and maildir syncing In-Reply-To: <20170808163508.25658-1-david@tethera.net> References: <20170808163508.25658-1-david@tethera.net> Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2017 22:04:19 -0300 Message-ID: <87fucrhung.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2017 01:04:34 -0000 David Bremner writes: > 1/2 is just a fixup for a typo that I made (and Tomi missed ;)) > 2/2 is to help decide the desired behaviour without 'unread' in new.tags > > The current behaviour is that maildir flags win: > > | unread in new.tags | ,S on file name | unread tag in db | > | Y | Y | N | > | N | Y | N | > | Y | N | Y | > | N | N | Y | > > This means in particular that files in new/ have unread whether or not > the user specifies that in new.tags. That might be the right > behaviour (it's certainly easier to impliment). I just want to confirm > either way before I update notmuch-new (and potentially drop the > "unread is not mandatory in new" test) Series pushed to master. Fix is still in progress. d