From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id +GrVNSzh6V7MPgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:23:56 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id iKm1MSzh6V4JYAAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:23:56 +0000 Received: from arlo.cworth.org (arlo.cworth.org [50.126.95.6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71138940145 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 09:23:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119476DE0941; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 02:23:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kV2VkbM6K2ij; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 02:23:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arlo.cworth.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABAE16DE0924; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 02:23:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45DA6DE0924 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 02:23:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XuYOqS5_hEOX for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 02:23:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Greylist: delayed 318 seconds by postgrey-1.36 at arlo; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 02:23:46 PDT Received: from mout02.posteo.de (mout02.posteo.de [185.67.36.66]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64B546DE024F for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 02:23:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE2F82400FC for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:18:24 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1592385505; bh=U9NY1ae5RCN24e+sZXRiRYrJq4bbNTjCnQutug87e1U=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=dyg8/fJInc5FFeBjNqBcyptE58aeaq4bPhC85x5lEsvTFkgRsU9XrPe3v7u2hEFLB TDFBVOC3lTjvUcIHY/ZjIJVjgAwCcSeXWLUJIN7KmZonJE1XOmmuvbKXpzl5WfdRqj HCYa4yfAOvPas7ipyERiib9GJlei4nsust+Nkxi60ohVrWSU9lJFldM7ATjaOvrSp4 yCYVQzhRw6R/ePhSBYJvA9kKm+HZdKP64QtUtoXHBXvYYC3lGrZ19O6eQyyxWGQY3B 0FLzWWZAs1bDYeSmw7zRvx0r32AlZTgQqBHPtB004Ic12i1wUQWLnUU6u+70LUMtuc e8q6tZrRUjsvw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 49mzy53kPJz6tmb; Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:18:21 +0200 (CEST) From: Dan =?utf-8?B?xIxlcm3DoWs=?= To: David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Feature freeze for notmuch 0.30: June 1 In-Reply-To: <87wo47usg0.fsf@tethera.net> References: <87sgfp3s92.fsf@tethera.net> <87blm2xoxt.fsf@tethera.net> <87wo47usg0.fsf@tethera.net> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2020 11:18:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87ftaum4ob.fsf@cgc-instruments.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org Sender: "notmuch" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (body hash did not verify) header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=dyg8/fJI; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (strict)" header.from=posteo.net (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org designates 50.126.95.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=notmuch-bounces@notmuchmail.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: U1HX2CwdM6fR David Bremner writes: > I've tagged a 3rd release candidate (which is of course rc2, because > this week I belong to the cult of 0 based indexing). All of the blockers > I know of are fixed, and I'd consider us in "deep freeze", hopefully to > release in a week or so if there are no nasty bugs discovered. > > Please test. Debian users can grab it from Debian experimental (really > this time, previously it had to go though NEW). I have tried updating the package in openSUSE Tumbleweed to 0.30~rc2 but running the tests results in the following failures: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- T357-index-decryption: Testing indexing decrypted mail FAIL verify signature with stashed session key good_sig: value not equal: data[0][0][0]["crypto"]["signed"]["status"][0]["status"] = 'error' != 'good' T590-thread-breakage: Testing thread breakage during reindexing BROKEN No ghosts should remain after deletion of second message T670-duplicate-mid: Testing duplicate message ids BROKEN First subject preserved in notmuch-show (json) BROKEN Regexp search for second subject Notmuch test suite complete. 1152/1156 tests passed. 3 broken tests failed as expected. 1 test failed. All tests in 1 file skipped. ERROR: parallel test suite returned error code 1 make: *** [test/Makefile.local:69: test] Error 1 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- I can reproduce these failures on my local machine as well as in the openSUSE build environment (the Open Build Service). As I am a bit reluctant to skip even more tests: could someone who is more familiar with notmuch maybe take a look at this or guide me through this? Thanks in advance, Dan