From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cworth@cworth.org>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE8A4431FBF;
	Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:16:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id aoLSQbqEzFj3; Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:16:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3FA0431FAE;
	Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:16:44 -0800 (PST)
From: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>
To: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>, Stefan Schmidt
	<stefan@datenfreihafen.org>
In-Reply-To: <1258816372.8741.15.camel@rover>
References: <20091121145111.GB19397@excalibur.local>
	<1258816372.8741.15.camel@rover>
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 18:16:33 +0100
Message-ID: <87einr4x3i.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: 25 minutes load time with emacs -f notmuch
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:16:46 -0000

On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:12:52 -0700, Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com> wrote:
> I haven't figured out how to quickly tag everything as already read or
> archived or whatever .. can someone who knows more about what's going on
> confirm my hypothesis and if so, suggest the best approach to getting to
> a happier state?

See my message up-thread. The only reasonable ways all really do involve
at least a little bit of C-code hacking to either prevent those tags
from getting put there by "notmuch new" or to make it easier to get them
off afterwards.

I'm hoping everyone with this problem will happen to choose a different
solution and we'll get a nice flood of patches to improve things. :-)

And I can't help but apologize. I've known about all these issues, and
wouldn't have invited people to try things out in the current state. But
it was nice of Keith to share this with everyone. And it's nice of all
you to come take a look at things.

So, I'll just ask for a little patience, and we'll hopefully have a nice
system soon.

-Carl