From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D155431FB6 for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 04:39:25 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3MvY5+M+bTbt for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 04:39:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9BE0431FAF for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 04:39:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from fctnnbsc30w-142167090129.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net ([142.167.90.129] helo=zancas.localnet) by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti2dn-00085S-TK; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 08:39:24 -0400 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Ti2di-0001ob-By; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 08:39:18 -0400 From: David Bremner To: Petter Reinholdtsen , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: 'notmuch new' leaking memory and getting slower over time? In-Reply-To: <87hanup1n2.fsf@zancas.localnet> References: <2flfwhht87d.fsf@diskless.uio.no> <87hanup1n2.fsf@zancas.localnet> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.14+163~g11a220a (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.2.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 08:39:18 -0400 Message-ID: <87ehiyqdxl.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam_bar: - X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:39:25 -0000 David Bremner writes: > > I'm marking this bug as fixed; feel free to let us know of any problems > with the new batch-tag format. I should say I mean the bug with message-ids with spaces in them. Performance issues with notmuch new (and particularly, bad prediction of completion times) remain, presumably.