From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD7A6DE3235 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 15:30:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.673 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.673 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.026, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I7p2hMNZRESC for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 15:30:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from avior.uberspace.de (avior.uberspace.de [185.26.156.32]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 420926DE3232 for ; Tue, 27 Mar 2018 15:30:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 19591 invoked from network); 27 Mar 2018 22:29:58 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO thinkbox) (127.0.0.1) by avior.uberspace.de with SMTP; 27 Mar 2018 22:29:58 -0000 Received: from teythoon by thinkbox with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1f0x6K-0005ec-Qr; Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:29:56 +0200 From: Justus Winter To: Floris Bruynooghe , David Bremner , "W. Trevor King" Cc: notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: New Python bindings In-Reply-To: References: <5694CA65.8010400@fastmail.net> <20160112102329.4269.20741@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de> <20160112185107.GA21580@odin.tremily.us> <87k1ucp6xb.fsf@tethera.net> <87po3x4tuc.fsf@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:29:56 +0200 Message-ID: <87efk5f8yj.fsf@thinkbox.jade-hamburg.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2018 22:30:04 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Floris Bruynooghe writes: > On Wed, Mar 21 2018, Justus Winter wrote: >> >> Floris Bruynooghe writes: >> >>> This is exactly what I have fixed in my alternative bindings which I >>> created around the end of last year [0]. So we do have an idea of how >>> to fix this, at the time I said I do believe that it's possible to also >>> do this for the existing bindings even though it is a lot of work. >>> After some talking between dkg and me we got to a way forward which >>> proposed this, but I must admit that after messing a little with getting >>> a pytest run integrated into the notmuch test-suite instead of using tox >>> I lost momentum on the project and didn't advance any further. >> >> I'm sorry that I didn't speak up when you announced your work. I'm >> actually excited about a new set of bindings for Python. I agree with >> using cffi. I briefly looked at the code, and I believe it is much >> nicer than what we currently have. > > Nice to hear, thanks! Thanks for all the work :) >> I trust that it works fine with Python 3, does it? > > The version I made so far *only* works on Python 3. Mostly because it > was easier, but it also allows some API niceties. Reasonable choice. Which versions of Python 3 are supported? I am also writing bindings and I am wondering which versions to target. Cheers, Justus --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEJWpOVeSnLZetJGjniNx+MzhfeR0FAlq6xeQACgkQiNx+Mzhf eR2Jzgf6AtZUQN4FIfnu2VynhBIBmBcDyOIjaTbajxwy2ZyuDajuastAX5AMgv7V 9fQ4s8BA2BHxQG2N3PDOjmRPiuPcIEv5+AilkME1dIIHlRxp/j8R12xcLQv6D14y Hqhtnp2kYKjVxjn90NwYKFWyiYopiDCWL+XN2f4Nyk8D0EMBWKIRr6Md7fyI7IbW PkK+FhPbvzO5Z7IxIdULVt/b/5M+yYVZzs4EkY7RyETe2VCPD2UzsaqyAXCcRW9K Kf75Gdd+Pdl6yALmQLzwSHObjh2cXCTPuyrwXaakrQL/1v7w0tNvDRSfbMlw3TeG AfmRWQm8YV9wvg2GL/A8EbnNKWwXZg== =zcWn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--