From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dme@dme.org>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1AC04196F3
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id Lfd3lDMjytSg for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:01:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wy0-f181.google.com (mail-wy0-f181.google.com
	[74.125.82.181])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17C3431FC1
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:01:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so2112729wyf.26
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:01:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.164.21 with SMTP id b21mr2227203wel.46.1272135677948;
	Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:01:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ut.hh.sledj.net (host83-217-165-81.dsl.vispa.com
	[83.217.165.81])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x1sm6146274wbx.13.2010.04.24.12.01.16
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
	Sat, 24 Apr 2010 12:01:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ut.hh.sledj.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id CB938594135; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:01:20 +0100 (BST)
To: Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org>, Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org>,
	notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: Wrapping up the 0.3 release
In-Reply-To: <m3eii43i82.fsf@x200.gr8dns.org>
References: <87ljcchnfc.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org>
	<m3eii43i82.fsf@x200.gr8dns.org>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2-20-g89ec2c1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
From: David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 20:01:20 +0100
Message-ID: <87d3xod69r.fsf@ut.hh.sledj.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 19:01:20 -0000

On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 09:53:17 -0700, Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org> wrote:
> >   * Reply is now splitting the window
> > 
> >     We're copying the original message into the new reply buffer, so
> >     what's the advantage of splitting here?
> 
> I'll voice my "don't like" of this feature as well, I guess.

This depends at least somewhat on the setting of `pop-up-windows'. Maybe
we should:

     (let ((pop-up-windows nil))
      ...)

in the reply code?

I think that notmuch window handling generally needs some consideration
and improvement.

> > Finally, any of the tweaks I suggested to notmuch-hello mode would be
> > quite welcome. I might take a whack at some of these.

Hopefully early next week for me.

dme.
-- 
David Edmondson, http://dme.org