From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1FA34196F0 for ; Wed, 5 May 2010 01:04:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=unavailable Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9nZsuEpubrcC for ; Wed, 5 May 2010 01:04:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipex4.johnshopkins.edu (ipex4.johnshopkins.edu [128.220.161.141]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19A3431FC1 for ; Wed, 5 May 2010 01:04:46 -0700 (PDT) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.52,332,1270440000"; d="scan'208";a="362279691" Received: from c-69-255-36-229.hsd1.md.comcast.net (HELO lucky) ([69.255.36.229]) by ipex4.johnshopkins.edu with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 05 May 2010 04:04:33 -0400 Received: from jkr by lucky with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O9Zat-0003NP-5L; Wed, 05 May 2010 04:04:35 -0400 From: Jesse Rosenthal To: Michal Sojka , Notmuch developer list Subject: Re: [PATCH] Modularize test suite In-Reply-To: <87bpcustf6.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> References: <87sk6cdbxz.fsf@jhu.edu> <87bpcustf6.fsf@steelpick.2x.cz> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.3.1-18-g688e1e7 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 04:04:35 -0400 Message-ID: <87d3xahizw.fsf@jhu.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 08:04:50 -0000 Hi Michal, On Wed, 05 May 2010 09:23:57 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote: > Junio has just applied relicensing patch for the Git test suite > (http://git.kernel.org/?p=git/git.git;a=commit;h=64b90323f65d2a3ac8d1ff4ed73be881f76aac8a) > so we can use it for notmuch. Oh, excellent -- in that case, we should definitely go with the battle-tested approach. > If you agree, I can refresh my git based modularization and send > the patches. What do you (and others) think? I certainly agree. I elected against looking at it, just to get out a solution without any licensing problems. But it was more out of necessity (and challenge). If we have the re-licensing, I'd quite happily rescind these patches, unless others for some reason feel strongly. All best, Jesse