From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <bremner@unb.ca>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25558431FD0
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 31 Dec 2011 05:06:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.3
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5
	tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=disabled
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id r0ND5g6Nt7kF for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Sat, 31 Dec 2011 05:06:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tempo.its.unb.ca (tempo.its.unb.ca [131.202.1.21])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 572FF431FB6
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Sat, 31 Dec 2011 05:06:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zancas.localnet
	(fctnnbsc36w-156034079193.pppoe-dynamic.High-Speed.nb.bellaliant.net
	[156.34.79.193]) (authenticated bits=0)
	by tempo.its.unb.ca (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBVD624o015108
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Sat, 31 Dec 2011 09:06:03 -0400
Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77)
	(envelope-from <bremner@unb.ca>)
	id 1RgydO-0002ub-4v; Sat, 31 Dec 2011 09:06:02 -0400
From: David Bremner <david@tethera.net>
To: Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org>, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org>,
	Dmitry Kurochkin <dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] emacs: unify search mechanisms
In-Reply-To: <87boqoap4o.fsf@nikula.org>
References: <1324786495-14221-1-git-send-email-dmitry.kurochkin@gmail.com>
	<cun7h1e8hkj.fsf@hotblack-desiato.hh.sledj.net>
	<87aa6a6rxi.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87boqoap4o.fsf@nikula.org>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.11~rc1+5~g8d34eca (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1
	(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 09:06:02 -0400
Message-ID: <87d3b46gcl.fsf@zancas.localnet>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 13:06:12 -0000

On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 14:42:47 +0200, Jani Nikula <jani@nikula.org> wrote:

> Would it be a suitable compromise to bind 's' to notmuch-search (the
> mini-buffer search) also in notmuch-hello, while leaving the search box
> there with a common history?

That would be fine for me. But other people might find it weird I guess.

d