From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C08DE6DE0C97 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 07:23:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.049 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.049 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.049] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uN7s6fqqbvvG for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 07:23:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from che.mayfirst.org (che.mayfirst.org [162.247.75.118]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9EDB6DE0C69 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 07:23:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fifthhorseman.net (unknown [38.109.115.130]) by che.mayfirst.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F301FF993; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 10:23:31 -0400 (EDT) Received: by fifthhorseman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 302DC201A7; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 06:59:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Daniel Kahn Gillmor To: Tomi Ollila , Mark Walters , Ioan-Adrian Ratiu , David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Add refresh all buffers functionality In-Reply-To: References: <20160924200735.25425-1-adi@adirat.com> <8737kpjbct.fsf@adiPC.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87twd5huym.fsf@adiPC.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87y42gc02k.fsf@zancas.localnet> <87bmzcde3q.fsf@adiPC.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87fuoowler.fsf@qmul.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2016 09:59:35 -0400 Message-ID: <87d1jd60jc.fsf@alice.fifthhorseman.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2016 14:23:37 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On Sun 2016-09-25 03:32:08 -0400, Tomi Ollila wrote: > 2) then, minor commit message related comment: if there is going to be v3, > in id:20160924200735.25425-2-adi@adirat.com adi mentioned 'next patches' > -- those are not patches (anymore) when commits are made, so it would be > better to reword that sentence. If anythine else doesn't come up, simplest > thing is to change the word to 'commits'. As said, this is minor thing, > and we have worse things in commit messages; if there is no need to send > v3, or the message change is forgotten then it may go in as it is now... Before these things are accepted into whatever you consider the canonical git repo to be, while they're still patches floating around in our various mailboxes, they aren't really "commits" either. I'd use "changesets" as the generic term. --dkg --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJX9ljHXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRFREIyRTc0RjU2RkNGMkI2NzI5N0I3MzUy NEVDRkY1QUZGNjgzNzBBAAoJECTs/1r/aDcK4h8P/jltGVCb6iDJSEfrWSvVhhO1 6/apl2OFJbaULkp4VA1oj+ipjVW9/+gDGIu7Q+TRzAgu651hnPw9HEW9nv1t6byU ePip5YlIn6v53DXjbANgJ0euwMzrcOAsJ1YDlAAGNZgSTGYQkl6B4sLtwvBsVroi xKxrhfEwMmZJzLOH5TiA5gUQw/lAHQFgyVQHhPRK+S/AHjDkZJjKb4hke4zveWAZ eM1gc/L+ZZkTSyPGkcgF67Ql3TuUAy6gEoZzhyY03aJlub6cyJMLuzN4OhswQiZA wTOloQp1FkePmbUOL/jhCQfvCy4BuEg7LASiZljJF7bLNFoz7L4ES2g1Xzju8gqP /iY5QQXAwve000wgYDvLaWXJ5i5bV4P4QznVcI2hQwbWq8IbNKC84PIkVza0sXX4 NhuPt4WbYfitrrlehCR1f+HZGDFA2ao3b7BPhg52dzYvPVJp3xEPVPrC6t5BP1ow /MdRHWvA4tPW+cq7z+eXqXaeZX/exQla+K3mDU7DXwOEIB7+s8mSzk1Vkwhgkadj NE4nE4bJC1maHxRacOqoq4OUNWOrbtS+lr5WdTdVVhUlTqK+BQ89n2VpxeCO7qrd joRpj7FtLRUuA2O/6PsGqsy+mJg+tMYHKIwwiMjcDWhdrzf9gUPHrl866uwiwaK2 sfiigpoHCkxmDifUYxTL =QAeT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--