From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971626DE0BB8 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 19:44:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.001 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.010, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kFKRYbmb9FUh for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 19:44:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B17B46DE0B0A for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2018 19:44:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fQ1xS-0008W1-9p; Mon, 04 Jun 2018 22:44:26 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 21317 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 05 Jun 2018 02:44:25 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Daniel Kahn Gillmor , debian mipsel buildd maintainers , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: build failures on mipsel In-Reply-To: <87wove9q35.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> References: <87wove9q35.fsf@fifthhorseman.net> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2018 23:44:25 -0300 Message-ID: <87d0x6osty.fsf@tethera.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2018 02:44:29 -0000 Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes: > > > I've tried to replicate the problem over on eller.debian.org (the mipsel > porterbox) but when i build 0.27~rc1 over there in an schroot, i don't > even get to T357 because the emacs_fcc_message() function hangs in this > loop (is this known to not work in an schroot or under similar > situations?): Try: $ make test-binaries && ./T357-index-decryption.sh That works for me on eller, so there must be some difference between the two environments (buildd versus porterbox) d