From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01F976DE0207 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:54:54 -0800 (PST) Authentication-Results: arlo.cworth.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=spwhitton.name header.i=@spwhitton.name header.b="jsfxRdo4"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="DqA6hUhm"; dkim-atps=neutral X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.699 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.797, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7xSqCUf7N7Yw for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:54:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F5396DE0204 for ; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 11:54:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F04220A7; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:54:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 21 Feb 2020 14:54:48 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=spwhitton.name; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm2; bh=YIO+V24iaJfs8PqHpj0nrQgVhI MdvCwmLrNySeBX8Fg=; b=jsfxRdo4Vomjye2+QaDXReoFkZKNhVj8NjHA3RQi6y 6qgfr4MbpMv1CihG/UFTJP+eJahvZU/y3lqACAkuzUJdUp/QcOfdufTYZBKBh5Ck 8mKVeBMFZszhjolEJ+HelbkvrgR+dnAC3AobtUScQU+KDq/ifPavcppNGtkYc44Z ZzuIxXcK0A/k9vapXtx2SvBxuWgTFbDUviax1L87o7dKbguqSl6WzJENX+r8Urqh vU6YRAGTrVRvALSq7Gsp31u/1e9ObCuRzMcWaoDfhhBxhpKvafskWyWV1nIPJP7w iTTTxgYUXXp4eAQPu+VTl+NkIwdSLPpPz8O4HaMNBViQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=YIO+V2 4iaJfs8PqHpj0nrQgVhIMdvCwmLrNySeBX8Fg=; b=DqA6hUhmiEU5rtISzI3Wnp 33Yc2GabbfV3jSnsNlO1nQr6A8Wg00p6mx2LEiyKAvMZ9v0doWZbiRRVSg3y5OrF y4qUaNlFNg7yUeMEoPQjHLocrEusbfevB/J4lsIALXaXVNNw+xHO36k9SZ3V/l9w oi70pQVZEEQj+ENMyEXC8lE0Wa7vyv+D1GYtRXqV3WvQ7TdXuqV8+dm/l7UsToKQ 0NJjBYoH2pqBr45MuKuGcGa6BWQejkBT20G3jg7tqO0yF4+YkfUEBMGl3+pPwb8Y 0+IQksB/TAJiaRl4R0GT6oCh/jpc2rMrQ+XJ6TbNICnUItBu4X8guTT+hbhGgGdQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrkeeggddufedtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufgjfhffkfggtgesthdtredttddttdenucfhrhhomhepufgvrghnucgh hhhithhtohhnuceoshhpfihhihhtthhonhesshhpfihhihhtthhonhdrnhgrmhgvqeenuc evlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehsphifhhhi thhtohhnsehsphifhhhithhtohhnrdhnrghmvg X-ME-Proxy: From: Sean Whitton To: David Bremner , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: Forcing a sync of maildir flags? In-Reply-To: <87mu9cg5xy.fsf@tethera.net> References: <871rqp97o0.fsf@iris.silentflame.com> <87r1ypsb1p.fsf@tethera.net> <87r1yp6joi.fsf@iris.silentflame.com> <87mu9cg5xy.fsf@tethera.net> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 12:54:46 -0700 Message-ID: <87d0a7zpfd.fsf@iris.silentflame.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 19:54:54 -0000 Hello, On Thu 20 Feb 2020 at 08:06PM -04, David Bremner wrote: > Sean Whitton writes: > >> So, your hypothesis is that notmuch is opting not to add the Seen flag >> in order to avoid having to move the message from new to cur, for the >> sake of mutt, but that's a bug because I've explicitly requested adding >> Seen, so it ought to go ahead and move it from new to cur? > > Yeah, I think that's the case. This is based only vague memories of when > I wrote 0082a557. Thanks. Let me record in this thread what I will believe it will take a reproduce this in a test: 1) inbox and sent are Maildirs 1) Compose mail to a mailing list which will return copies of submissions, with `Fcc: sent -unread` 2) notmuch new, and in post-new hook, notmuch tag -unread -- folder:sent Expected result: copy of message in both inbox and sent has Seen flag Actual result: only copy of message in sent has Seen flag -- Sean Whitton