From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <five9a2@gmail.com>
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586C2431FBC
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  1 Dec 2009 08:45:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org
Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id dMIC++7ouDTv for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>;
	Tue,  1 Dec 2009 08:45:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-bw0-f224.google.com (mail-bw0-f224.google.com
	[209.85.218.224])
	by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE7B431FAE
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue,  1 Dec 2009 08:45:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by bwz24 with SMTP id 24so3652119bwz.30
	for <notmuch@notmuchmail.org>; Tue, 01 Dec 2009 08:45:27 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:from:to:subject
	:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type;
	bh=1nVSlzOXD6LVST+eD2IhW2Bg3x0t0LTNKGvBfefkJe0=;
	b=kGUX2wACBhPZS7rx79BjlmUVpgAwNvmNnfJPruxTCHSHnAUsFOKQ07LIVs+JOeW0aN
	Vp5Yl1DDYusXt8vH07BpzqD1cXtmtaAB03JNVsX7cGhBPS/sqxHEyr+xA0ZRxmzbar10
	l50OhLX+Rckz9Tc+uEbXTpM9hPomksk9uh4JQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
	:mime-version:content-type;
	b=W0U2UIeS6RkCcz+IPS9wjeKRG/RqUA8FFKr1G6BkPn5MptHPZoXE3sC0HwZiv7z8EV
	dt4usjT43YB1NWFJgBf39625rvxV0IkGI6r51l3MfP+FBjMzMIlqhZ5qh8IOZ9pwNDgD
	tBAc9mn71/ruCMmfpABk2Cfr+jGLkDEG75Frc=
Received: by 10.204.35.142 with SMTP id p14mr6351370bkd.21.1259685926075;
	Tue, 01 Dec 2009 08:45:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kunyang (vawpc43.ethz.ch [129.132.59.11])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 26sm367656fks.20.2009.12.01.08.45.23
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
	Tue, 01 Dec 2009 08:45:24 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Jed Brown <five9a2@gmail.com>
From: Jed Brown <jed@59A2.org>
To: Steen Manniche <steen@manniche.net>, notmuch@notmuchmail.org
In-Reply-To: <20091201093305.GA16198@algorithm>
References: <20091201093305.GA16198@algorithm>
Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:46:04 +0100
Message-ID: <87bpii63sj.fsf@59A2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: Problem building notmuch
X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system."
	<notmuch.notmuchmail.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/options/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch>
List-Post: <mailto:notmuch@notmuchmail.org>
List-Help: <mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://notmuchmail.org/mailman/listinfo/notmuch>,
	<mailto:notmuch-request@notmuchmail.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Dec 2009 16:45:29 -0000

On Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:33:05 +0100, Steen Manniche <steen@manniche.net> wrote:
> Probably unusable system info:
> % uname -a
> Linux algorithm 2.6.31-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Oct 23 11:12:58 CEST
> 2009 i686 Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU P9500 @ 2.53GHz GenuineIntel
> GNU/Linux

This is pretty much my fault because I made the talloc package that is
on AUR.  The problem is that you have both talloc-1 (from the smbclient
package) and talloc-2 (from the AUR talloc).  The libtalloc.so symlink
points at smbclient's copy, but smbclient doesn't include a pkgconfig
for talloc, thus you are using the talloc-2 header and talloc-1 library.

How do other distros handle talloc-1/talloc-2 incompatibility?

Jed