From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB992429E25 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 08:47:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.7 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NqD51yngew+J for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 08:47:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com (mail-qy0-f181.google.com [209.85.216.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDC04431FB6 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 08:47:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by qyk27 with SMTP id 27so6235973qyk.5 for ; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 08:47:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.240.7 with SMTP id ky7mr2339094qcb.243.1319989658140; Sun, 30 Oct 2011 08:47:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (209-6-79-248.c3-0.abr-ubr1.sbo-abr.ma.cable.rcn.com. [209.6.79.248]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id du5sm25853594qab.14.2011.10.30.08.47.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 30 Oct 2011 08:47:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Ivy Foster To: Thomas Jost , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [Patch] Fix Emacs interface bug dealing with invisible text In-Reply-To: <877h3mhkbk.fsf@schnouki.net> References: <878vo47i82.fsf@nausicaa.localdomain> <877h3mhkbk.fsf@schnouki.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.9-17-ge6d85fb (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 11:44:51 -0400 Message-ID: <87bosya3gs.fsf@nausicaa.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 15:47:39 -0000 On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 10:58:55 +0100, Thomas Jost wrote: > Thanks for this patch. I haven't tested it, but I will! Fair enough (-: > However, I'm wondering something: wasn't this issue > already addressed in Dmitry's patch series that I rebased > and reposted almost a month ago, specifically patches 9/13 > to 12/13? Whoops! I didn't realize a fix was already pending. I suppose I should've looked through the mail archive first. Guess I got a little over-enthusiastic. Sorry about that! Yes, those would appear to handle the same issue. Ivy