On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:25:19 +0000, David Edmondson <dme@dme.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2012 10:46:57 -0800, Jameson Graef Rollins <jrollins@finestructure.net> wrote:
> > Is there a reason it's really necessary to make this change?  Can't
> > callers just ignore the returned button if they don't care about it
> > further?  I can see that maybe it's nice to be able to specify
> > parameters at creation time, but I'm not sure why that requires throwing
> > out the returned object as well.
> 
> Patches 2 and 3 in that series can result in the button not being
> inserted.

Can patches 2 and 3 be rewritten so they are compatible with the button
being returned by the button creation function?

jamie.