From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0540E431FBD for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 03:45:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[none] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nGl5eCb+zmaT for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 03:45:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tesseract.cs.unb.ca (tesseract.cs.unb.ca [131.202.240.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 808B1431FBC for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 03:45:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fctnnbsc30w-156034089108.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.nb.bellaliant.net ([156.34.89.108] helo=zancas.localnet) by tesseract.cs.unb.ca with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Si1N1-0003CU-6Z; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 07:45:47 -0300 Received: from bremner by zancas.localnet with local (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1Si1Mv-0007NH-KV; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 07:45:37 -0300 From: David Bremner To: Jesse Rosenthal , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] emacs: derive correct timestamp in FCC unique name In-Reply-To: <87y5npg6gc.fsf@jhu.edu> References: <87d353ezyw.fsf@jhu.edu> <87y5npg6gc.fsf@jhu.edu> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.13.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 07:45:37 -0300 Message-ID: <87bokbd3qm.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Spam_bar: - X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 10:45:49 -0000 Jesse Rosenthal writes: > This change is mostly a question of consistency, since the unique name > is arbitrary anyway. But since most people use timestamps, and that was > the original intention here as well, we might as well. pushed. d