From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 659786DE0297 for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 18:30:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at cworth.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.006 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.006 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.005, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from arlo.cworth.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arlo.cworth.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xziffEgbAIoi for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 18:30:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fethera.tethera.net (fethera.tethera.net [198.245.60.197]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 870F86DE01CE for ; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 18:30:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from remotemail by fethera.tethera.net with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1burKD-0006GJ-7S; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 21:30:17 -0400 Received: (nullmailer pid 9978 invoked by uid 1000); Fri, 14 Oct 2016 01:30:29 -0000 From: David Bremner To: Keith Amidon , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Expand docstrings about fcc using notmuch-insert In-Reply-To: <1476398420.2162.1.camel@picnicpark.org> References: <20161011045222.15723-1-camalot@picnicpark.org> <1476398420.2162.1.camel@picnicpark.org> Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 22:30:29 -0300 Message-ID: <87bmynvhsa.fsf@zancas.localnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 01:30:37 -0000 Keith Amidon writes: > Did my attempt to submit via git send-email the documentation patch > quoted below somehow not get forwarded by the list server? I never got > a copy forwarded by the list but just assumed that it was suppressing > copies to the authors. Having observed that folks here are usually > very good about reviewing patch submissions quickly and not having > gotten any feedback, I'm wondering if something went wrong after all... > > --- Keith Hi Keith; No technical difficulties, we're just not as good as you think we are at quick reviews ;). I wanted to hear what Mark felt about exposing these internals as docstring. I OK with it, but it does make it slightly harder to change things later. d