From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5BB84196F0 for ; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:38:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.89 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.89 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_00=-1.9, T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=ham Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZCBhPynXc0VE; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:38:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15C1431FC1; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:38:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9CDEF25400A; Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:38:37 -0700 (PDT) From: Carl Worth To: Paul R , notmuch@notmuchmail.org Subject: Re: notmuch emacs interface In-Reply-To: <87y6g953yx.fsf@aspirouf.lan> References: <87y6g953yx.fsf@aspirouf.lan> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.2-251-g8514e59 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.1.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:38:37 -0700 Message-ID: <87aasonbwi.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 15:38:38 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 17:07:18 +0200, Paul R wrote: > following the activity on this list, I've seen a recent effort toward > improving the behaviour of the Emacs frontend to notmuch, which is > a really nice thing. Thanks so much. > I also read the main emacs development mailing list, as well as the Gnus > ML, and I haven't seen any mention of NotMuch there, or maybe just once > on the later. Right. Someone at one point did at least float the idea of notmuch to users of "org mode". I'm not sure exactly which list that was on. > I'm pretty sure most emacs hackers want notmuch thought, because it > brings a fresh, clean, responsive, reliable and efficient way of dealing > with mails from emacs. In my experience, there is no prior art in this > area (unfortunately). You could probably easily attract a handful of > core emacs developers to notmuch, therefore benefit from their amazing > emacs-fu to improve the frontend. >=20 > Do you have a plan for that ? I think announcing it on emacs devel > mailing list would be ok, even if it is slightly off topic. I didn't have any specific plans. I think things like this are generally great if done by people already reading those lists. Would you like to send a note including something very much like the paragraph above along with "Hey, I thought some poeple here might be interested in the recent development of notmuch. ... See the notmuch@notmuchmail.org list for more."? Thanks for the idea, =2DCarl --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFL1wT96JDdNq8qSWgRAnA+AJ0ah117MaJy7lapNDwQLnhIz6Z/6gCfU+iu GkBk5Jbt3+mh9RqFkfKFCSs= =rjLA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--