From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A926C429E2A for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:33:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at olra.theworths.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.01 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[T_MIME_NO_TEXT=0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from olra.theworths.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (olra.theworths.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rT3wBHkJ1bw9 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:33:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from arlo.cworth.org (arlo.cworth.org [50.43.72.2]) by olra.theworths.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8F7429E25 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:33:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yoom.home.cworth.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arlo.cworth.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEB2629A820; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:33:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by yoom.home.cworth.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CDF0A2541A8; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:33:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Carl Worth To: Jameson Graef Rollins , Notmuch Mail Subject: Re: Debian package not building In-Reply-To: <87y60qby8l.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> References: <87y60qby8l.fsf@servo.factory.finestructure.net> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:33:06 -0700 Message-ID: <87aad1agzx.fsf@yoom.home.cworth.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: notmuch@notmuchmail.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: "Use and development of the notmuch mail system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 19:33:08 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:34:02 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote: > Hey, folks. As of today I am for some reason no longer able to build > the Notmuch Debian package. I'm using the same build technique I have > been using for a while (git-buildpackage). The tail of the failing > build log is pasted at the bottom of this message. Is anyone else > encountering anything like this? I use git-buildpackage as well. I did recently need to "apt-get install python-all" for a recent build-dependency addition. But I'm not getting any failure like you are getting here. > I did recently do a system upgrade, so it's > possible that something there could have caused the problem. For what it's worth, I did hit some recent problems when doing a Debian upgrade of libc6. The problem I hit manifested itself much worse, (no dynamically-linked programs would run). That bug (and its fix) is described here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D629534 I don't know if it's related to your problem at all, but it's certainly possible that something unrelated to notmuch is causing the failure you're getting. =2DCarl =2D-=20 carl.d.worth@intel.com --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk4KLHIACgkQ6JDdNq8qSWjInACcDjkAHddESgIinaH3ycrbdYvr j04AniIk0cRyU6hALL/syXkbVO4FqF5S =5H39 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--